{"title":"专业知识(一般专业知识理论)","authors":"A. Nesterov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2035367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the main theoretical, regulatory, and practical problems of expertics. It describes a new scientific direction in the field of juridical sciences, specifically in the study of the legal and juridical attributes of expertise and expert activity. Expertics is defined to be a combination of science, practice, and scholarly study. The necessity of studying expertics pertains not only to lawyers, but also to lay individuals whose work concerns various institutions of expertise","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expertics (General Theory of Expertise)\",\"authors\":\"A. Nesterov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2035367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the main theoretical, regulatory, and practical problems of expertics. It describes a new scientific direction in the field of juridical sciences, specifically in the study of the legal and juridical attributes of expertise and expert activity. Expertics is defined to be a combination of science, practice, and scholarly study. The necessity of studying expertics pertains not only to lawyers, but also to lay individuals whose work concerns various institutions of expertise\",\"PeriodicalId\":301526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of Innovation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of Innovation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2035367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2035367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper considers the main theoretical, regulatory, and practical problems of expertics. It describes a new scientific direction in the field of juridical sciences, specifically in the study of the legal and juridical attributes of expertise and expert activity. Expertics is defined to be a combination of science, practice, and scholarly study. The necessity of studying expertics pertains not only to lawyers, but also to lay individuals whose work concerns various institutions of expertise
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
