帝国效应:第一个全球化时代国家风险的决定因素,1880-1913

N. Ferguson, M. Schularick
{"title":"帝国效应:第一个全球化时代国家风险的决定因素,1880-1913","authors":"N. Ferguson, M. Schularick","doi":"10.1017/S002205070600012X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reassesses the importance of colonial status to investors before 1914 by means of multivariable regression analysis of the data available to contemporaries. We show that British colonies were able to borrow in London at significantly lower rates of interest than non-colonies precisely because of their colonial status, which mattered more than either gold convertibility or a balanced budget. Allowing for differences not only in monetary and fiscal policy but also in economic development and location, the â¬SEmpire effectâ¬? was a discount of around 100 basis points. We conclude that investors saw colonial status as a no-default guarantee.","PeriodicalId":208085,"journal":{"name":"NYU: Economics Working Papers (Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"219","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Empire Effect: The Determinants of Country Risk in the First Age of Globalization, 1880-1913\",\"authors\":\"N. Ferguson, M. Schularick\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S002205070600012X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reassesses the importance of colonial status to investors before 1914 by means of multivariable regression analysis of the data available to contemporaries. We show that British colonies were able to borrow in London at significantly lower rates of interest than non-colonies precisely because of their colonial status, which mattered more than either gold convertibility or a balanced budget. Allowing for differences not only in monetary and fiscal policy but also in economic development and location, the â¬SEmpire effectâ¬? was a discount of around 100 basis points. We conclude that investors saw colonial status as a no-default guarantee.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NYU: Economics Working Papers (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"219\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NYU: Economics Working Papers (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002205070600012X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NYU: Economics Working Papers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002205070600012X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 219

摘要

本文通过对同时代可用数据的多变量回归分析,重新评估了1914年以前殖民地地位对投资者的重要性。我们表明,英国殖民地能够以比非殖民地低得多的利率在伦敦借款,正是因为它们的殖民地地位,这比黄金可兑换性或平衡预算更重要。考虑到不仅在货币和财政政策方面,而且在经济发展和地理位置方面的差异,帝国效应。折价约100个基点。我们的结论是,投资者将殖民状态视为无违约担保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Empire Effect: The Determinants of Country Risk in the First Age of Globalization, 1880-1913
This paper reassesses the importance of colonial status to investors before 1914 by means of multivariable regression analysis of the data available to contemporaries. We show that British colonies were able to borrow in London at significantly lower rates of interest than non-colonies precisely because of their colonial status, which mattered more than either gold convertibility or a balanced budget. Allowing for differences not only in monetary and fiscal policy but also in economic development and location, the â¬SEmpire effectâ¬? was a discount of around 100 basis points. We conclude that investors saw colonial status as a no-default guarantee.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信