通用交换在ATE中的好处:探索COTS通用交换解决方案的好处

Robert C. Waldeck
{"title":"通用交换在ATE中的好处:探索COTS通用交换解决方案的好处","authors":"Robert C. Waldeck","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The commercial offerings in ATE over the last 20-30 years has shown a strong disparity between COTS solutions available to the integrator vs the solutions offered by the large turnkey ATE manufacturers. This disparity is primarily focused in the area of switching. For the system integrators, the choice has been a wide variety of switching products, primarily in formats such as VXI or more recently PXI. These offerings are various unrelated switches in Matrix, Tree and SPDT or SPST formats. There has been minimal effort among the card providers to offer a set of cards which work together to create a unified switching system. The Turnkey system providers on the other hand have primarily focused on providing systems with highly integrated Universal Switching architectures. The reason for the disparity is puzzling as the Turnkey system providers clearly see strong advantage in the Universal Switching Architecture, strong enough to spend significant resources in developing a proprietary switching system of their own. Surprisingly, the commercial card providers have not jumped onto this bandwagon and developed commercial alternatives for System Integrators until recently. Recently we have been spending time with more customers wrestling with Legacy ATE challenges. It has been our experience that Universal Switching can be both a way forward as well as providing a future platform more suited for TPS transportability. This paper will explore both the functionality as well as the merits of Universal Switching systems in an effort to help the reader make an informed decision. Considering that the fielding of any group of TPS's on a system platform frequently exceeds the cost of the Test System itself, sometimes to a large degree, the ability to reduce the cost of the TPS development as well as future transition to a next generation system is a significant driver in the reduction of the overall cost of ownership of the program. We will also explore how Universal Switching can be used to replace non-Universal Switching in fielded ATE Systems, and how it more readily supports new technology insertions and creates a next generation test platform which more readily supports TPS transportability across platforms.","PeriodicalId":314357,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","volume":"448 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of universal switching in ATE: Exploring the benefits of COTS Universal Switching solutions\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Waldeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The commercial offerings in ATE over the last 20-30 years has shown a strong disparity between COTS solutions available to the integrator vs the solutions offered by the large turnkey ATE manufacturers. This disparity is primarily focused in the area of switching. For the system integrators, the choice has been a wide variety of switching products, primarily in formats such as VXI or more recently PXI. These offerings are various unrelated switches in Matrix, Tree and SPDT or SPST formats. There has been minimal effort among the card providers to offer a set of cards which work together to create a unified switching system. The Turnkey system providers on the other hand have primarily focused on providing systems with highly integrated Universal Switching architectures. The reason for the disparity is puzzling as the Turnkey system providers clearly see strong advantage in the Universal Switching Architecture, strong enough to spend significant resources in developing a proprietary switching system of their own. Surprisingly, the commercial card providers have not jumped onto this bandwagon and developed commercial alternatives for System Integrators until recently. Recently we have been spending time with more customers wrestling with Legacy ATE challenges. It has been our experience that Universal Switching can be both a way forward as well as providing a future platform more suited for TPS transportability. This paper will explore both the functionality as well as the merits of Universal Switching systems in an effort to help the reader make an informed decision. Considering that the fielding of any group of TPS's on a system platform frequently exceeds the cost of the Test System itself, sometimes to a large degree, the ability to reduce the cost of the TPS development as well as future transition to a next generation system is a significant driver in the reduction of the overall cost of ownership of the program. We will also explore how Universal Switching can be used to replace non-Universal Switching in fielded ATE Systems, and how it more readily supports new technology insertions and creates a next generation test platform which more readily supports TPS transportability across platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"volume\":\"448 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的20-30年里,ATE的商业产品已经显示出集成商可用的COTS解决方案与大型交钥匙ATE制造商提供的解决方案之间的巨大差异。这种差异主要集中在切换领域。对于系统集成商来说,选择的开关产品种类繁多,主要是VXI或最近的PXI等格式。这些产品是矩阵、树和SPDT或SPST格式的各种不相关的开关。卡提供商很少努力提供一组卡,这些卡一起工作以创建一个统一的交换系统。另一方面,交钥匙系统供应商主要专注于提供具有高度集成的通用交换架构的系统。这种差异的原因令人费解,因为交钥匙系统供应商清楚地看到了通用交换体系结构的强大优势,强大到足以花费大量资源开发自己的专有交换系统。令人惊讶的是,商业卡提供商直到最近才加入这一潮流,并为系统集成商开发商业替代方案。最近,我们花时间与更多的客户一起解决遗留ATE的挑战。根据我们的经验,通用交换既可以是前进的方向,也可以提供一个更适合TPS可移植性的未来平台。本文将探讨通用开关系统的功能和优点,以帮助读者做出明智的决定。考虑到在系统平台上部署任何一组TPS的成本经常超过测试系统本身的成本,有时在很大程度上,降低TPS开发成本以及未来向下一代系统过渡的能力是降低项目总体拥有成本的重要驱动因素。我们还将探讨如何使用通用交换来取代现场ATE系统中的非通用交换,以及它如何更容易地支持新技术的插入,并创建更容易支持TPS跨平台可移植性的下一代测试平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of universal switching in ATE: Exploring the benefits of COTS Universal Switching solutions
The commercial offerings in ATE over the last 20-30 years has shown a strong disparity between COTS solutions available to the integrator vs the solutions offered by the large turnkey ATE manufacturers. This disparity is primarily focused in the area of switching. For the system integrators, the choice has been a wide variety of switching products, primarily in formats such as VXI or more recently PXI. These offerings are various unrelated switches in Matrix, Tree and SPDT or SPST formats. There has been minimal effort among the card providers to offer a set of cards which work together to create a unified switching system. The Turnkey system providers on the other hand have primarily focused on providing systems with highly integrated Universal Switching architectures. The reason for the disparity is puzzling as the Turnkey system providers clearly see strong advantage in the Universal Switching Architecture, strong enough to spend significant resources in developing a proprietary switching system of their own. Surprisingly, the commercial card providers have not jumped onto this bandwagon and developed commercial alternatives for System Integrators until recently. Recently we have been spending time with more customers wrestling with Legacy ATE challenges. It has been our experience that Universal Switching can be both a way forward as well as providing a future platform more suited for TPS transportability. This paper will explore both the functionality as well as the merits of Universal Switching systems in an effort to help the reader make an informed decision. Considering that the fielding of any group of TPS's on a system platform frequently exceeds the cost of the Test System itself, sometimes to a large degree, the ability to reduce the cost of the TPS development as well as future transition to a next generation system is a significant driver in the reduction of the overall cost of ownership of the program. We will also explore how Universal Switching can be used to replace non-Universal Switching in fielded ATE Systems, and how it more readily supports new technology insertions and creates a next generation test platform which more readily supports TPS transportability across platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信