精益六西格玛工具和可持续绩效测量:综述

Ikram Ait Hammou, Salah Oulfarsi
{"title":"精益六西格玛工具和可持续绩效测量:综述","authors":"Ikram Ait Hammou, Salah Oulfarsi","doi":"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's highly competitive business world, firms are constantly trying to rethink their processes in order to attain customer satisfaction and thus the highest levels of profitability. However, the increasingly high requirements of customers, the government, and other stakeholders have led to new hurdles in achieving more sustainable operations that incorporate social and environmental issues into production processes, while also achieving high levels of profitability. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a method that has been proven to be effective for companies in order to attain sustainable performance goals. However, few studies have been devoted to reviewing the literature in order to identify the most commonly used LSS tools in the context of sustainability, as well as the different measures used to assess the economic, social and environmental outcomes that result from the use of the LSS approach. Thus, the objective of this paper is to conduct an in-depth literature review to present and synthesize the main results of previous studies on the impact of LSS tools on companies' sustainable performance pillars. The main finding of this literature review was that there are four categories of studies that have presented the relationship between the LSS approach and the concept of sustainability. Furthermore, the most used LSS tools in the context of sustainability have been identified, among which VSM, Cause and effect diagram, Pareto analysis, 5S, DoE, DMAIC and 5 why analysis. In addition, some of the least used LSS tools in the literature are TQM, Process Sigma Calculation, Consumption analysis, Cost- benefit analysis, SOPs and JIT. We also concluded that among the three dimensions of sustainable performance, the number of social performance measurements used is the highest.","PeriodicalId":253343,"journal":{"name":"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lean Six Sigma tools and sustainable performance measurments: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Ikram Ait Hammou, Salah Oulfarsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today's highly competitive business world, firms are constantly trying to rethink their processes in order to attain customer satisfaction and thus the highest levels of profitability. However, the increasingly high requirements of customers, the government, and other stakeholders have led to new hurdles in achieving more sustainable operations that incorporate social and environmental issues into production processes, while also achieving high levels of profitability. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a method that has been proven to be effective for companies in order to attain sustainable performance goals. However, few studies have been devoted to reviewing the literature in order to identify the most commonly used LSS tools in the context of sustainability, as well as the different measures used to assess the economic, social and environmental outcomes that result from the use of the LSS approach. Thus, the objective of this paper is to conduct an in-depth literature review to present and synthesize the main results of previous studies on the impact of LSS tools on companies' sustainable performance pillars. The main finding of this literature review was that there are four categories of studies that have presented the relationship between the LSS approach and the concept of sustainability. Furthermore, the most used LSS tools in the context of sustainability have been identified, among which VSM, Cause and effect diagram, Pareto analysis, 5S, DoE, DMAIC and 5 why analysis. In addition, some of the least used LSS tools in the literature are TQM, Process Sigma Calculation, Consumption analysis, Cost- benefit analysis, SOPs and JIT. We also concluded that among the three dimensions of sustainable performance, the number of social performance measurements used is the highest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 14th International Colloquium of Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA55056.2022.9938024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在当今竞争激烈的商业世界中,公司不断试图重新思考他们的流程,以获得客户满意度,从而达到最高水平的盈利能力。然而,客户、政府和其他利益相关者的要求越来越高,这给实现更可持续的运营带来了新的障碍,将社会和环境问题纳入生产过程,同时实现高水平的盈利能力。精益六西格玛(LSS)是一种方法,已被证明是有效的公司,以实现可持续的绩效目标。然而,很少有研究专门审查文献,以确定在可持续性背景下最常用的LSS工具,以及用于评估使用LSS方法所产生的经济、社会和环境结果的不同措施。因此,本文的目的是进行深入的文献综述,以呈现和综合以往关于LSS工具对公司可持续绩效支柱影响的研究的主要结果。本文献综述的主要发现是,有四类研究提出了LSS方法与可持续性概念之间的关系。此外,还确定了可持续发展背景下使用最多的LSS工具,其中包括VSM、因果关系图、帕累托分析、5S、DoE、DMAIC和5个为什么分析。此外,文献中使用最少的LSS工具有TQM、过程西格玛计算、消耗分析、成本效益分析、sop和JIT。我们还得出结论,在可持续绩效的三个维度中,社会绩效测量的使用数量是最高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lean Six Sigma tools and sustainable performance measurments: A Review
In today's highly competitive business world, firms are constantly trying to rethink their processes in order to attain customer satisfaction and thus the highest levels of profitability. However, the increasingly high requirements of customers, the government, and other stakeholders have led to new hurdles in achieving more sustainable operations that incorporate social and environmental issues into production processes, while also achieving high levels of profitability. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a method that has been proven to be effective for companies in order to attain sustainable performance goals. However, few studies have been devoted to reviewing the literature in order to identify the most commonly used LSS tools in the context of sustainability, as well as the different measures used to assess the economic, social and environmental outcomes that result from the use of the LSS approach. Thus, the objective of this paper is to conduct an in-depth literature review to present and synthesize the main results of previous studies on the impact of LSS tools on companies' sustainable performance pillars. The main finding of this literature review was that there are four categories of studies that have presented the relationship between the LSS approach and the concept of sustainability. Furthermore, the most used LSS tools in the context of sustainability have been identified, among which VSM, Cause and effect diagram, Pareto analysis, 5S, DoE, DMAIC and 5 why analysis. In addition, some of the least used LSS tools in the literature are TQM, Process Sigma Calculation, Consumption analysis, Cost- benefit analysis, SOPs and JIT. We also concluded that among the three dimensions of sustainable performance, the number of social performance measurements used is the highest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信