ICRSS:群体间冲突解决支持系统

J. Carey, D. Olson
{"title":"ICRSS:群体间冲突解决支持系统","authors":"J. Carey, D. Olson","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An overview is presented of a computer-based methodology for intergroup conflict resolution that uses Pareto optimal techniques and can be administered totally by a computer interface. The methodology uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign weights to issues for each group and then computes various feasible treaties or courses of action. These treaties can then be negotiated with the constraint that each group can raise its treaty value as long as the other group does not suffer a loss (Pareto optimality). An additional benefit of the methodology is that as the assumptions, goals, and issues are determined, each group has the chance to view the other's rationale without being thrust into conflict. A pilot study for testing the construct validity and usability of the system is presented.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384442,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICRSS: Interactive Conflict Resolution Support System for inter-group situations\",\"authors\":\"J. Carey, D. Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An overview is presented of a computer-based methodology for intergroup conflict resolution that uses Pareto optimal techniques and can be administered totally by a computer interface. The methodology uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign weights to issues for each group and then computes various feasible treaties or courses of action. These treaties can then be negotiated with the constraint that each group can raise its treaty value as long as the other group does not suffer a loss (Pareto optimality). An additional benefit of the methodology is that as the assumptions, goals, and issues are determined, each group has the chance to view the other's rationale without being thrust into conflict. A pilot study for testing the construct validity and usability of the system is presented.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":384442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

概述了一种基于计算机的群体间冲突解决方法,该方法使用帕累托最优技术,可以完全通过计算机界面进行管理。该方法使用层次分析法(AHP)为每组问题分配权重,然后计算各种可行的条约或行动方案。这些条约可以在约束条件下进行谈判,即只要另一组不遭受损失,每一组都可以提高其条约价值(帕累托最优性)。该方法的另一个好处是,当假设、目标和问题确定时,每个小组都有机会了解对方的基本原理,而不会陷入冲突。为测试系统的结构有效性和可用性,进行了初步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ICRSS: Interactive Conflict Resolution Support System for inter-group situations
An overview is presented of a computer-based methodology for intergroup conflict resolution that uses Pareto optimal techniques and can be administered totally by a computer interface. The methodology uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign weights to issues for each group and then computes various feasible treaties or courses of action. These treaties can then be negotiated with the constraint that each group can raise its treaty value as long as the other group does not suffer a loss (Pareto optimality). An additional benefit of the methodology is that as the assumptions, goals, and issues are determined, each group has the chance to view the other's rationale without being thrust into conflict. A pilot study for testing the construct validity and usability of the system is presented.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信