聊天机器人和可解释的人工智能

Marcus R. Wigan, G. Adamson, P. Rani, Nick Dyson, Fabian Horton
{"title":"聊天机器人和可解释的人工智能","authors":"Marcus R. Wigan, G. Adamson, P. Rani, Nick Dyson, Fabian Horton","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many areas of artificial intelligence, explainability provides assurance that a decision sits within an acceptable range of possible decisions. In the field of chatbots, however, the function of an AI is to provide an explanation to the user. Users may assume that the purpose of the chatbot is defined by this function. Before we consider the explanatory function of an AI chatbot, we should examine this assumption of purpose. In this research we consider two chatbot cases, the first being where the purpose may not be to inform the user, and secondly, where this should be the purpose. In the commercial sphere we identify two perspectives of AI chatbot purpose: that of the provider, and that of the user. No necessary commonality exists between these two perspectives of purpose. In the government services sphere, methods of increasing the alignment between requested information and appropriate response include “law as code” as a mechanism for simplifying the automation of regulation.","PeriodicalId":180420,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chatbots and Explainable Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Marcus R. Wigan, G. Adamson, P. Rani, Nick Dyson, Fabian Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For many areas of artificial intelligence, explainability provides assurance that a decision sits within an acceptable range of possible decisions. In the field of chatbots, however, the function of an AI is to provide an explanation to the user. Users may assume that the purpose of the chatbot is defined by this function. Before we consider the explanatory function of an AI chatbot, we should examine this assumption of purpose. In this research we consider two chatbot cases, the first being where the purpose may not be to inform the user, and secondly, where this should be the purpose. In the commercial sphere we identify two perspectives of AI chatbot purpose: that of the provider, and that of the user. No necessary commonality exists between these two perspectives of purpose. In the government services sphere, methods of increasing the alignment between requested information and appropriate response include “law as code” as a mechanism for simplifying the automation of regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于人工智能的许多领域来说,可解释性提供了决策在可能决策的可接受范围内的保证。然而,在聊天机器人领域,人工智能的功能是向用户提供解释。用户可以假设聊天机器人的目的是由这个函数定义的。在我们考虑人工智能聊天机器人的解释功能之前,我们应该检查一下这个目的假设。在这项研究中,我们考虑了两种聊天机器人的情况,第一种情况的目的可能不是通知用户,第二种情况的目的应该是通知用户。在商业领域,我们确定了人工智能聊天机器人目的的两个角度:提供者的角度和用户的角度。这两种目的观点之间没有必要的共性。在政府服务领域,增加所要求的信息与适当反应之间的一致性的方法包括“法律即法典”,作为简化管理自动化的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chatbots and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
For many areas of artificial intelligence, explainability provides assurance that a decision sits within an acceptable range of possible decisions. In the field of chatbots, however, the function of an AI is to provide an explanation to the user. Users may assume that the purpose of the chatbot is defined by this function. Before we consider the explanatory function of an AI chatbot, we should examine this assumption of purpose. In this research we consider two chatbot cases, the first being where the purpose may not be to inform the user, and secondly, where this should be the purpose. In the commercial sphere we identify two perspectives of AI chatbot purpose: that of the provider, and that of the user. No necessary commonality exists between these two perspectives of purpose. In the government services sphere, methods of increasing the alignment between requested information and appropriate response include “law as code” as a mechanism for simplifying the automation of regulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信