双语能力是否与三级英语水平的提高相关或预示着三级英语水平的提高?单语学习者与双语学习者的对比研究

Eliane Lorenz, Sharareh Rahbari, Ulrike Schackow, Peter Siemund
{"title":"双语能力是否与三级英语水平的提高相关或预示着三级英语水平的提高?单语学习者与双语学习者的对比研究","authors":"Eliane Lorenz, Sharareh Rahbari, Ulrike Schackow, Peter Siemund","doi":"10.1558/JMTP.15517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates whether English in instructed settings is more successfully acquired by learners who are already bilingual in comparison to those with a monolingual background. There remains substantial controversy regarding potential advantages of bilingual speakers in their acquisition of additional languages, especially in heritage speaker contexts. We here contribute to this discussion by analysing the English C-test results of 1,718 bilingual and monolingual students of grades 7 and 9, sampled in schools across Germany. The bilingual students speak either Russian or Turkish (heritage language) and German (majority language). The monolingual control group was raised in German only. The main predictor variables are reading fluency and comprehension in German and the heritage languages. Additional predictor variables include school type, school year, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, amongst others. Using correlation and regression analyses we test if reading fluency and comprehension impact proficiency in English and if bilingual students enjoy advantages over their monolingual German peers. The results reveal no systematic advantage of bilingual students, although we find significant correlations between reading fluency and comprehension and C-test results. School type, cognitive skills, among others, are predictors for English performance, whereas socioeconomic status returns no significant effect. ","PeriodicalId":391103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does bilingualism correlate with or predict higher proficiency in L3 English? A contrastive study of monolingual and bilingual learners\",\"authors\":\"Eliane Lorenz, Sharareh Rahbari, Ulrike Schackow, Peter Siemund\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/JMTP.15517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates whether English in instructed settings is more successfully acquired by learners who are already bilingual in comparison to those with a monolingual background. There remains substantial controversy regarding potential advantages of bilingual speakers in their acquisition of additional languages, especially in heritage speaker contexts. We here contribute to this discussion by analysing the English C-test results of 1,718 bilingual and monolingual students of grades 7 and 9, sampled in schools across Germany. The bilingual students speak either Russian or Turkish (heritage language) and German (majority language). The monolingual control group was raised in German only. The main predictor variables are reading fluency and comprehension in German and the heritage languages. Additional predictor variables include school type, school year, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, amongst others. Using correlation and regression analyses we test if reading fluency and comprehension impact proficiency in English and if bilingual students enjoy advantages over their monolingual German peers. The results reveal no systematic advantage of bilingual students, although we find significant correlations between reading fluency and comprehension and C-test results. School type, cognitive skills, among others, are predictors for English performance, whereas socioeconomic status returns no significant effect. \",\"PeriodicalId\":391103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMTP.15517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMTP.15517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究调查了在指导环境下,双语学习者是否比单语学习者更能成功地习得英语。关于双语者在习得额外语言方面的潜在优势,特别是在传统语言语境中,仍然存在大量争议。在此,我们通过分析1718名德国7年级和9年级双语和单语学生的英语c测试结果,为这一讨论做出贡献。双语学生讲俄语或土耳其语(传统语言)和德语(多数语言)。单语对照组只在德语环境中长大。主要的预测变量是德语和传统语言的阅读流畅性和理解力。其他预测变量包括学校类型、学年、社会经济地位、认知能力等。使用相关和回归分析,我们测试了阅读流畅性和理解是否影响英语熟练程度,以及双语学生是否比单语德语学生更有优势。虽然我们发现阅读流畅性和理解能力与c测试成绩之间存在显著的相关性,但研究结果并未显示双语学生的系统性优势。学校类型、认知技能等是英语表现的预测因素,而社会经济地位没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does bilingualism correlate with or predict higher proficiency in L3 English? A contrastive study of monolingual and bilingual learners
This study investigates whether English in instructed settings is more successfully acquired by learners who are already bilingual in comparison to those with a monolingual background. There remains substantial controversy regarding potential advantages of bilingual speakers in their acquisition of additional languages, especially in heritage speaker contexts. We here contribute to this discussion by analysing the English C-test results of 1,718 bilingual and monolingual students of grades 7 and 9, sampled in schools across Germany. The bilingual students speak either Russian or Turkish (heritage language) and German (majority language). The monolingual control group was raised in German only. The main predictor variables are reading fluency and comprehension in German and the heritage languages. Additional predictor variables include school type, school year, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, amongst others. Using correlation and regression analyses we test if reading fluency and comprehension impact proficiency in English and if bilingual students enjoy advantages over their monolingual German peers. The results reveal no systematic advantage of bilingual students, although we find significant correlations between reading fluency and comprehension and C-test results. School type, cognitive skills, among others, are predictors for English performance, whereas socioeconomic status returns no significant effect. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信