基于二类分类器的缺陷晶圆图检测方法研究

Seima Sakaguchi, Yasushi Arimura, T. Yamauchi, Yuichi Tokuyama, Tomoya Kawai, Hidetaka Eguchi, Hiroyuki Morinaga, H. Kawanaka, Tetsushi Wakabayashi
{"title":"基于二类分类器的缺陷晶圆图检测方法研究","authors":"Seima Sakaguchi, Yasushi Arimura, T. Yamauchi, Yuichi Tokuyama, Tomoya Kawai, Hidetaka Eguchi, Hiroyuki Morinaga, H. Kawanaka, Tetsushi Wakabayashi","doi":"10.1109/ISSM55802.2022.10026916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In semiconductor manufacturing, a pattern of chips with electrical failures in the wafer is usually used to identify failure factors. Wafers with similar in-plane trends are likely to have the same defect factors, and clustering techniques are often used to identify defect factors. It is, however, difficult for clustering approaches to make a cluster of infrequent unknown patterns. As a result, it will occur missing defect patterns. We discussed the method to detect infrequent unknown patterns and accurately classify frequent known defect patterns. We tried to make the proposed scheme with three strategies. As the first approach, VGG16 and SVM were used as the feature extractor and a classifier, respectively. The second approach is Convolutional Auto Encoder (CAE). We constructed CAEs for each known class, and the CAEs were trained to reconstruct the input images. When we take the above strategy, the constructed CAE cannot reconstruct the same image when the input image does not belong to the same class. It will be helpful to judge whether the given image belongs to the same class. The third approach uses the difference degree between the given image and typical images. The calculated value of the difference is used for distinguishing using thresholds. The experimental results show that the classification accuracy of known classes is 75.9%, the detection rate of unknown classes is 62.5%, and unknown clusters containing 35.7% of unknown classes are successfully created. To improve yield, it is essential to detect unknown defects at an early stage. If we can generate clusters that are mostly composed of unknown classes, it will be possible to recognize the occurrence of unknown defects. Since the proposed method was able to generate clusters in which unknown classes account for about 35%, we believe that it is sufficient to detect the occurrence of unknown defects.","PeriodicalId":130513,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Detection Method Using 2-Class Classifiers for Defective Wafer Maps\",\"authors\":\"Seima Sakaguchi, Yasushi Arimura, T. Yamauchi, Yuichi Tokuyama, Tomoya Kawai, Hidetaka Eguchi, Hiroyuki Morinaga, H. Kawanaka, Tetsushi Wakabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSM55802.2022.10026916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In semiconductor manufacturing, a pattern of chips with electrical failures in the wafer is usually used to identify failure factors. Wafers with similar in-plane trends are likely to have the same defect factors, and clustering techniques are often used to identify defect factors. It is, however, difficult for clustering approaches to make a cluster of infrequent unknown patterns. As a result, it will occur missing defect patterns. We discussed the method to detect infrequent unknown patterns and accurately classify frequent known defect patterns. We tried to make the proposed scheme with three strategies. As the first approach, VGG16 and SVM were used as the feature extractor and a classifier, respectively. The second approach is Convolutional Auto Encoder (CAE). We constructed CAEs for each known class, and the CAEs were trained to reconstruct the input images. When we take the above strategy, the constructed CAE cannot reconstruct the same image when the input image does not belong to the same class. It will be helpful to judge whether the given image belongs to the same class. The third approach uses the difference degree between the given image and typical images. The calculated value of the difference is used for distinguishing using thresholds. The experimental results show that the classification accuracy of known classes is 75.9%, the detection rate of unknown classes is 62.5%, and unknown clusters containing 35.7% of unknown classes are successfully created. To improve yield, it is essential to detect unknown defects at an early stage. If we can generate clusters that are mostly composed of unknown classes, it will be possible to recognize the occurrence of unknown defects. Since the proposed method was able to generate clusters in which unknown classes account for about 35%, we believe that it is sufficient to detect the occurrence of unknown defects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSM55802.2022.10026916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSM55802.2022.10026916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在半导体制造中,晶圆中带有电气故障的芯片模式通常用于识别故障因素。具有相似面内趋势的晶圆可能具有相同的缺陷因素,而聚类技术通常用于识别缺陷因素。然而,对于聚类方法来说,很难将不常见的未知模式聚在一起。因此,会出现缺失缺陷模式。我们讨论了检测不常见的未知模式和准确分类常见的已知缺陷模式的方法。我们试图用三种策略来制定所提出的方案。作为第一种方法,VGG16和SVM分别作为特征提取器和分类器。第二种方法是卷积自动编码器(CAE)。我们为每个已知类别构建cae,并训练cae来重建输入图像。当我们采用上述策略时,当输入图像不属于同一类时,所构建的CAE无法重构出相同的图像。这将有助于判断给定的图像是否属于同一类。第三种方法是利用给定图像与典型图像之间的差异程度。差值的计算值用于使用阈值进行区分。实验结果表明,已知类的分类准确率为75.9%,未知类的检测率为62.5%,成功创建了包含35.7%未知类的未知聚类。为了提高成品率,在早期发现未知缺陷是非常必要的。如果我们能够生成主要由未知类组成的集群,就有可能识别未知缺陷的发生。由于所提出的方法能够生成未知类约占35%的聚类,因此我们认为它足以检测未知缺陷的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Detection Method Using 2-Class Classifiers for Defective Wafer Maps
In semiconductor manufacturing, a pattern of chips with electrical failures in the wafer is usually used to identify failure factors. Wafers with similar in-plane trends are likely to have the same defect factors, and clustering techniques are often used to identify defect factors. It is, however, difficult for clustering approaches to make a cluster of infrequent unknown patterns. As a result, it will occur missing defect patterns. We discussed the method to detect infrequent unknown patterns and accurately classify frequent known defect patterns. We tried to make the proposed scheme with three strategies. As the first approach, VGG16 and SVM were used as the feature extractor and a classifier, respectively. The second approach is Convolutional Auto Encoder (CAE). We constructed CAEs for each known class, and the CAEs were trained to reconstruct the input images. When we take the above strategy, the constructed CAE cannot reconstruct the same image when the input image does not belong to the same class. It will be helpful to judge whether the given image belongs to the same class. The third approach uses the difference degree between the given image and typical images. The calculated value of the difference is used for distinguishing using thresholds. The experimental results show that the classification accuracy of known classes is 75.9%, the detection rate of unknown classes is 62.5%, and unknown clusters containing 35.7% of unknown classes are successfully created. To improve yield, it is essential to detect unknown defects at an early stage. If we can generate clusters that are mostly composed of unknown classes, it will be possible to recognize the occurrence of unknown defects. Since the proposed method was able to generate clusters in which unknown classes account for about 35%, we believe that it is sufficient to detect the occurrence of unknown defects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信