刑事案件审前程序中法院与检察官在举证过程中的互动特征

Fiodor M. Kobzarev, Pavel F. Kobzarev
{"title":"刑事案件审前程序中法院与检察官在举证过程中的互动特征","authors":"Fiodor M. Kobzarev, Pavel F. Kobzarev","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-214-219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proceeding from the common human rights goals of the court and the prosecutor to achieve the appointment of criminal proceedings and the relationship of their powers in the pre-trial stages, the article discusses the content and features of the procedural interaction of these participants in the process of evidence. As an example, on the basis of an analysis of the procedure for consideration by the court of complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, attention is drawn to the essence of the participation in evidence in such cases of the court and the prosecutor; the legal and law enforcement problems of the exercise of their powers and various options for their solution are proposed. At the same time, the importance of ensuring the correct combination of control and supervisory powers of these participants in the criminal process is indicated; moreover, taking into account the content of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Russian Federation on the category of materials updated in 2022, the need for a clearer legislative definition of the limits of evidence, increasing the assets, is justified. In addition, the directions of improving the procedure for considering such complaints, the need to comply with the sequence of their reception for consideration are specified. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, deduction) and private scientific methods (formal-logical, comparative jurisprudence, etc.). As conclusions, it is proposed to make a number of additions to the criminal procedure law, including Article 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and other norms.","PeriodicalId":326235,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEATURES OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PROSECUTOR IN THE PROCESS OF PROOF DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CRIMINAL CASE\",\"authors\":\"Fiodor M. Kobzarev, Pavel F. Kobzarev\",\"doi\":\"10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-214-219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proceeding from the common human rights goals of the court and the prosecutor to achieve the appointment of criminal proceedings and the relationship of their powers in the pre-trial stages, the article discusses the content and features of the procedural interaction of these participants in the process of evidence. As an example, on the basis of an analysis of the procedure for consideration by the court of complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, attention is drawn to the essence of the participation in evidence in such cases of the court and the prosecutor; the legal and law enforcement problems of the exercise of their powers and various options for their solution are proposed. At the same time, the importance of ensuring the correct combination of control and supervisory powers of these participants in the criminal process is indicated; moreover, taking into account the content of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Russian Federation on the category of materials updated in 2022, the need for a clearer legislative definition of the limits of evidence, increasing the assets, is justified. In addition, the directions of improving the procedure for considering such complaints, the need to comply with the sequence of their reception for consideration are specified. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, deduction) and private scientific methods (formal-logical, comparative jurisprudence, etc.). As conclusions, it is proposed to make a number of additions to the criminal procedure law, including Article 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and other norms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Kostroma State University\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Kostroma State University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-214-219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-3-214-219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从法院与检察官在审前阶段实现刑事诉讼约定的共同人权目标及其权力关系出发,探讨了这些参与人在证据过程中的程序互动的内容和特点。例如,在分析法院根据《俄罗斯刑事诉讼法》第125条审议申诉的程序的基础上,提请注意法院和检察官在这类案件中参与作证的本质;提出了权力行使中的法律和执法问题以及解决问题的各种选择。同时,指出了确保刑事诉讼参与人的控制权和监督权正确结合的重要性;此外,考虑到俄罗斯联邦最高全会关于2022年更新的材料类别的决议的内容,有必要对证据范围进行更明确的立法定义,增加资产。此外,还规定了改进审议这类申诉的程序的指示,以及必须遵守受理申诉的顺序。研究采用了一般的科学方法(分析、演绎)和私人的科学方法(形式逻辑、比较法学等)。最后,建议对刑事诉讼法作一些补充,包括《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第37条和其他规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FEATURES OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE COURT AND THE PROSECUTOR IN THE PROCESS OF PROOF DURING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CRIMINAL CASE
Proceeding from the common human rights goals of the court and the prosecutor to achieve the appointment of criminal proceedings and the relationship of their powers in the pre-trial stages, the article discusses the content and features of the procedural interaction of these participants in the process of evidence. As an example, on the basis of an analysis of the procedure for consideration by the court of complaints in accordance with Article 125 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, attention is drawn to the essence of the participation in evidence in such cases of the court and the prosecutor; the legal and law enforcement problems of the exercise of their powers and various options for their solution are proposed. At the same time, the importance of ensuring the correct combination of control and supervisory powers of these participants in the criminal process is indicated; moreover, taking into account the content of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Russian Federation on the category of materials updated in 2022, the need for a clearer legislative definition of the limits of evidence, increasing the assets, is justified. In addition, the directions of improving the procedure for considering such complaints, the need to comply with the sequence of their reception for consideration are specified. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, deduction) and private scientific methods (formal-logical, comparative jurisprudence, etc.). As conclusions, it is proposed to make a number of additions to the criminal procedure law, including Article 37 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and other norms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信