H. Masamoto, K. Mekaru, T. Nakasone, Tadatsugu Kinjo, T. Nakamoto, W. Kudaka, Y. Aoki, Y. Kinjyo, Yuko Iraha, Y. Taira
{"title":"表观扩散系数值对ⅰ期卵巢癌与交界性上皮性卵巢癌的鉴别价值","authors":"H. Masamoto, K. Mekaru, T. Nakasone, Tadatsugu Kinjo, T. Nakamoto, W. Kudaka, Y. Aoki, Y. Kinjyo, Yuko Iraha, Y. Taira","doi":"10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To clarify usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of stage I \nmalignant epithelial ovarian tumor (MOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor (BOT), the ADC value \nof the solid portion or thickened wall of ovarian tumors was evaluated by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance \nimaging system in 18 cases of BOT and MOT. The median of average ADC value was 1.668 × 10?3 mm2 \n/s \nfor BOT and 1.021 × 10?3 mm2 \n/s for MOT (p = 0.0005), and the median of minimum ADC value was 1.394 \n× 10?3 mm2 \n/s for BOT and 0.812× 10?3 mm2 \n/s for MOT (p = 0.0006), both of which were significantly \nlower in MOT than that in BOT. So the ADC value is useful and especially the minimum ADC value is \nuseful in that it can easily measure the ROI so that it contains solid portion or thickened wall.","PeriodicalId":112166,"journal":{"name":"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation between stage I ovarian cancer and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor by apparent diffusion coefficient value\",\"authors\":\"H. Masamoto, K. Mekaru, T. Nakasone, Tadatsugu Kinjo, T. Nakamoto, W. Kudaka, Y. Aoki, Y. Kinjyo, Yuko Iraha, Y. Taira\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To clarify usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of stage I \\nmalignant epithelial ovarian tumor (MOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor (BOT), the ADC value \\nof the solid portion or thickened wall of ovarian tumors was evaluated by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance \\nimaging system in 18 cases of BOT and MOT. The median of average ADC value was 1.668 × 10?3 mm2 \\n/s \\nfor BOT and 1.021 × 10?3 mm2 \\n/s for MOT (p = 0.0005), and the median of minimum ADC value was 1.394 \\n× 10?3 mm2 \\n/s for BOT and 0.812× 10?3 mm2 \\n/s for MOT (p = 0.0006), both of which were significantly \\nlower in MOT than that in BOT. So the ADC value is useful and especially the minimum ADC value is \\nuseful in that it can easily measure the ROI so that it contains solid portion or thickened wall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Is it all just an Akt - you’d be SMAD to believe it! Role of TGFβ1 in oral cancer metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.RDI.2018.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differentiation between stage I ovarian cancer and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor by apparent diffusion coefficient value
To clarify usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in the differential diagnosis of stage I
malignant epithelial ovarian tumor (MOT) and borderline epithelial ovarian tumor (BOT), the ADC value
of the solid portion or thickened wall of ovarian tumors was evaluated by a 1.5-T magnetic resonance
imaging system in 18 cases of BOT and MOT. The median of average ADC value was 1.668 × 10?3 mm2
/s
for BOT and 1.021 × 10?3 mm2
/s for MOT (p = 0.0005), and the median of minimum ADC value was 1.394
× 10?3 mm2
/s for BOT and 0.812× 10?3 mm2
/s for MOT (p = 0.0006), both of which were significantly
lower in MOT than that in BOT. So the ADC value is useful and especially the minimum ADC value is
useful in that it can easily measure the ROI so that it contains solid portion or thickened wall.