GARP和Maxent在津巴布韦炭疽芽孢杆菌地理分布建模中的比较

S. Chikerema, I. Gwitira, A. Murwira, D. Pfukenyi, G. Matope
{"title":"GARP和Maxent在津巴布韦炭疽芽孢杆菌地理分布建模中的比较","authors":"S. Chikerema, I. Gwitira, A. Murwira, D. Pfukenyi, G. Matope","doi":"10.4314/ZVJ.V35I1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of presence-only models can be used in the prediction of the geographic distribution of diseases and/or their vectors. The predictive performance of these models differs depending on a number of factors but primarily the modeled species’ ecological traits. In this study, the performance of GARP and Maxent, two of the most commonly used modelling methods were compared in predicting presence and absence of anthrax in Zimbabwe using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa statistic and the Jaccard coefficient as measures of model performance. The results showed that GARP had higher accuracy than Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent = 0.67). Both methods had equal sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.71), but GARP had higher specificity (GARP=0.70, Maxent=0.67). Both Kappa and the Jaccard coefficient were also higher for GARP (0.335; 0.36) than for Maxent (0.295; 0.34). The results imply that GARP has superior performance over Maxent and is recommended for modelling species habitat suitability.Keywords: ENMs, GARP, Maxent, Anthrax","PeriodicalId":345251,"journal":{"name":"Zimbabwe veterinary journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"S. Chikerema, I. Gwitira, A. Murwira, D. Pfukenyi, G. Matope\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ZVJ.V35I1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of presence-only models can be used in the prediction of the geographic distribution of diseases and/or their vectors. The predictive performance of these models differs depending on a number of factors but primarily the modeled species’ ecological traits. In this study, the performance of GARP and Maxent, two of the most commonly used modelling methods were compared in predicting presence and absence of anthrax in Zimbabwe using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa statistic and the Jaccard coefficient as measures of model performance. The results showed that GARP had higher accuracy than Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent = 0.67). Both methods had equal sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.71), but GARP had higher specificity (GARP=0.70, Maxent=0.67). Both Kappa and the Jaccard coefficient were also higher for GARP (0.335; 0.36) than for Maxent (0.295; 0.34). The results imply that GARP has superior performance over Maxent and is recommended for modelling species habitat suitability.Keywords: ENMs, GARP, Maxent, Anthrax\",\"PeriodicalId\":345251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zimbabwe veterinary journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zimbabwe veterinary journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZVJ.V35I1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zimbabwe veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZVJ.V35I1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在预测疾病和(或)其病媒的地理分布时,可使用若干只存在模式。这些模型的预测性能取决于许多因素,但主要是模型物种的生态特征。在本研究中,比较了GARP和Maxent这两种最常用的建模方法在预测津巴布韦炭疽存在和不存在方面的性能,使用准确性、敏感性、特异性、Kappa统计量和Jaccard系数作为模型性能的度量。结果表明,GARP的准确率高于Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent = 0.67)。两种方法的敏感性相等(敏感性= 0.71),但GARP的特异性更高(GARP=0.70, Maxent=0.67)。GARP的Kappa系数和Jaccard系数也较高(0.335;0.36)比Maxent (0.295;0.34)。结果表明,GARP在模拟物种生境适宜性方面优于Maxent。关键词:ENMs, GARP, Maxent,炭疽
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of GARP and Maxent in modelling the geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis in Zimbabwe
A number of presence-only models can be used in the prediction of the geographic distribution of diseases and/or their vectors. The predictive performance of these models differs depending on a number of factors but primarily the modeled species’ ecological traits. In this study, the performance of GARP and Maxent, two of the most commonly used modelling methods were compared in predicting presence and absence of anthrax in Zimbabwe using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Kappa statistic and the Jaccard coefficient as measures of model performance. The results showed that GARP had higher accuracy than Maxent (GARP = 0.70, Maxent = 0.67). Both methods had equal sensitivity (sensitivity = 0.71), but GARP had higher specificity (GARP=0.70, Maxent=0.67). Both Kappa and the Jaccard coefficient were also higher for GARP (0.335; 0.36) than for Maxent (0.295; 0.34). The results imply that GARP has superior performance over Maxent and is recommended for modelling species habitat suitability.Keywords: ENMs, GARP, Maxent, Anthrax
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信