腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的可行性

N. Horikawa, A. Horie, Shunsuke Kawahara, Masumi Sunada, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, K. Yamaguchi, J. Hamanishi, Eiji Kondo, M. Mandai
{"title":"腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的可行性","authors":"N. Horikawa, A. Horie, Shunsuke Kawahara, Masumi Sunada, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, K. Yamaguchi, J. Hamanishi, Eiji Kondo, M. Mandai","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiological evaluation of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) possess the risk of missing microscopic metastasis. We commenced laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Lap-PAN) on patients with LACC for surgical staging in 2016. We assessed the feasibility of Lap-PAN in patients with LACC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 patients with LACC who were staged at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIB to IVA without enlargement of the para-aortic lymph nodes who underwent radiation therapy in our hospital between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. The postoperative outcomes of Lap-PAN were analyzed, and distinct parameters for each patient, including sites of recurrence and disease-free survival, were compared between the Lap-PAN (n = 12) and no surgery (n = 19) groups. Results: The average operation time for Lap-PAN was 167 min, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 ml in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. The average number of excised lymph nodes was 25, and no pathological metastases were observed. There was no difference in disease-free survival rates between the Lap-PAN and no surgery groups (p = 0.42). During the follow-up period, there were two cases of recurrence in the cervix in the Lap-PAN group, and three and four cases of lung and para-aortic lymph node recurrence, respectively in the no-surgery group. Conclusions: Lap-PAN was safely performed as a pretherapeutic staging method for LACC without worsening patient prognosis. Although Lap-PAN requires a high level of skill, it may be a method to avoid excessive radiation for LACC.","PeriodicalId":114569,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer\",\"authors\":\"N. Horikawa, A. Horie, Shunsuke Kawahara, Masumi Sunada, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, K. Yamaguchi, J. Hamanishi, Eiji Kondo, M. Mandai\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Radiological evaluation of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) possess the risk of missing microscopic metastasis. We commenced laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Lap-PAN) on patients with LACC for surgical staging in 2016. We assessed the feasibility of Lap-PAN in patients with LACC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 patients with LACC who were staged at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIB to IVA without enlargement of the para-aortic lymph nodes who underwent radiation therapy in our hospital between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. The postoperative outcomes of Lap-PAN were analyzed, and distinct parameters for each patient, including sites of recurrence and disease-free survival, were compared between the Lap-PAN (n = 12) and no surgery (n = 19) groups. Results: The average operation time for Lap-PAN was 167 min, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 ml in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. The average number of excised lymph nodes was 25, and no pathological metastases were observed. There was no difference in disease-free survival rates between the Lap-PAN and no surgery groups (p = 0.42). During the follow-up period, there were two cases of recurrence in the cervix in the Lap-PAN group, and three and four cases of lung and para-aortic lymph node recurrence, respectively in the no-surgery group. Conclusions: Lap-PAN was safely performed as a pretherapeutic staging method for LACC without worsening patient prognosis. Although Lap-PAN requires a high level of skill, it may be a method to avoid excessive radiation for LACC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者主动脉旁淋巴结转移的影像学评估具有显微转移缺失的风险。我们于2016年开始对LACC患者进行腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术(Lap-PAN)进行手术分期。我们评估了Lap-PAN在LACC患者中的可行性。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月1日至2018年12月31日在我院接受放疗的31例国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO) 2009 IIB至IVA分期无主动脉旁淋巴结肿大的LACC患者的记录。分析Lap-PAN的术后结果,并比较Lap-PAN组(n = 12)和未手术组(n = 19)患者的不同参数,包括复发部位和无病生存期。结果:Lap-PAN的平均手术时间为167 min,所有患者估计失血量均小于50 ml。无围手术期并发症。平均切除淋巴结25个,未见病理转移。Lap-PAN组与未手术组无病生存率无差异(p = 0.42)。随访期间Lap-PAN组宫颈复发2例,未手术组肺及主动脉旁淋巴结复发3例,未手术组肺及主动脉旁淋巴结复发4例。结论:Lap-PAN作为LACC的治疗前分期方法是安全的,不会使患者预后恶化。虽然Lap-PAN需要高水平的技术,但它可能是一种避免LACC过度辐射的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
Background: Radiological evaluation of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) possess the risk of missing microscopic metastasis. We commenced laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy (Lap-PAN) on patients with LACC for surgical staging in 2016. We assessed the feasibility of Lap-PAN in patients with LACC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 31 patients with LACC who were staged at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 IIB to IVA without enlargement of the para-aortic lymph nodes who underwent radiation therapy in our hospital between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. The postoperative outcomes of Lap-PAN were analyzed, and distinct parameters for each patient, including sites of recurrence and disease-free survival, were compared between the Lap-PAN (n = 12) and no surgery (n = 19) groups. Results: The average operation time for Lap-PAN was 167 min, and the estimated blood loss was less than 50 ml in all patients. There were no perioperative complications. The average number of excised lymph nodes was 25, and no pathological metastases were observed. There was no difference in disease-free survival rates between the Lap-PAN and no surgery groups (p = 0.42). During the follow-up period, there were two cases of recurrence in the cervix in the Lap-PAN group, and three and four cases of lung and para-aortic lymph node recurrence, respectively in the no-surgery group. Conclusions: Lap-PAN was safely performed as a pretherapeutic staging method for LACC without worsening patient prognosis. Although Lap-PAN requires a high level of skill, it may be a method to avoid excessive radiation for LACC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信