国际法视角下的南海争议

Pangesti Suciningtyas
{"title":"国际法视角下的南海争议","authors":"Pangesti Suciningtyas","doi":"10.15294/digest.v2i1.48634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South China Sea issue is getting worse. China's claims overlap with those of other parties such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. To defend its claim, China is trying to dominate, both in the disputed territory and in multilateral negotiations. In the disputed territory, China seized the area, carried out reclamation, and attacked ships in other countries under various pretexts. Until the Philippines finally brought the dispute to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration said that China's claims regarding the nine dash lines were indisputable and had no legal basis. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Which was a source of international law was rejected by China. This article aims to describe the validity of the Permanent Court of Arbitration decision if the decision is rejected by one party based on the perspective of international law.","PeriodicalId":141082,"journal":{"name":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The South China Sea Disputes in International Law Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Pangesti Suciningtyas\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/digest.v2i1.48634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The South China Sea issue is getting worse. China's claims overlap with those of other parties such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. To defend its claim, China is trying to dominate, both in the disputed territory and in multilateral negotiations. In the disputed territory, China seized the area, carried out reclamation, and attacked ships in other countries under various pretexts. Until the Philippines finally brought the dispute to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration said that China's claims regarding the nine dash lines were indisputable and had no legal basis. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Which was a source of international law was rejected by China. This article aims to describe the validity of the Permanent Court of Arbitration decision if the decision is rejected by one party based on the perspective of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v2i1.48634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v2i1.48634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南海问题越来越严重。中国的主张与越南、菲律宾、马来西亚和文莱等其他各方的主张重叠。为了捍卫自己的主权主张,中国正试图在争议领土和多边谈判中占据主导地位。在争议海域,中国以各种借口侵占、填海造地,袭击别国船只。直到菲律宾最终将争议提交常设仲裁法院。常设仲裁法院的裁决称,中国关于“九段线”的主张是无可争辩的,没有法律依据。常设仲裁法院的裁决。这是国际法的一个来源,但被中国拒绝了。本文旨在从国际法的角度描述常设仲裁法院裁决被一方当事人拒绝时的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The South China Sea Disputes in International Law Perspective
The South China Sea issue is getting worse. China's claims overlap with those of other parties such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei. To defend its claim, China is trying to dominate, both in the disputed territory and in multilateral negotiations. In the disputed territory, China seized the area, carried out reclamation, and attacked ships in other countries under various pretexts. Until the Philippines finally brought the dispute to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration said that China's claims regarding the nine dash lines were indisputable and had no legal basis. The decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. Which was a source of international law was rejected by China. This article aims to describe the validity of the Permanent Court of Arbitration decision if the decision is rejected by one party based on the perspective of international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信