{"title":"感染对糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响巴基斯坦一项基于医院的队列研究","authors":"S. Sethi, I. Khanum, U. Javed, Sania Sabir","doi":"10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.","PeriodicalId":261891,"journal":{"name":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Infection on Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients; a Hospital-based Cohort Study in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"S. Sethi, I. Khanum, U. Javed, Sania Sabir\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aeji.2022.156178.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Infection on Glycemic Control in Diabetic Patients; a Hospital-based Cohort Study in Pakistan
had poor-control. The mean pre-infection HbA1c in good-control diabetic patients was 6.2% while in poor-control was 8.5% (p: 0.000). While the mean post-infection HbA1c in the good-control was 6.9% and in the poor-control was 8.3% (p: 0.010). The poor-control group had a higher infection-related death rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p: 0.72), and multiple sites of infection (65.2% vs. 34.8%, p: 0.47). In the poor-control group, there was a higher rate of re-infection (52.8 vs. 47.2%, p: 0.45), whereas the rate of septic shock was similar (50%, p: 0.42). Conclusion: Based on our study, we conclude that infection had variable effect on glycemic control . Moreover, diabetes per se had a major effect on infection risk, its severity, and mortality, regardless of glycemic control.