临床医生和老年人对参考定价的看法:硬币的两面

J. Mullett, R. Coughlan
{"title":"临床医生和老年人对参考定价的看法:硬币的两面","authors":"J. Mullett, R. Coughlan","doi":"10.1177/073346489801700303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government of British Columbia instituted a reference-based pricing (RBP) policy on pharmaceutical drugs to limit reimbursement costs. Only less expensive and therapeutically effective drugs and not \"Cadillac\" versions of chemically similar drugs would be reimbursed. The effect of the imminent implementation of this policy on seniors and clinicians (physicians, pharmacists, and various medical specialists) was explored through focus groups. Although the topic was RBP, the overwhelming majority of responses were concerned with various aspects of physician-patient interactions. Most seniors supported the RBP initiative and viewed excessive profits for pharmaceutical corporations as wasteful. Many seniors wished to be more involved in deciding treatment possibilities and to be better informed. In contrast, the clinicians viewed the policy as interference and a restriction of their authority, preferring a more collaborative educative approach to changes in drug prescribing Implications of these divergent views are discussed.","PeriodicalId":220319,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' and Seniors' Views of Reference- Based Pricing: Two Sides of a Coin\",\"authors\":\"J. Mullett, R. Coughlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/073346489801700303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government of British Columbia instituted a reference-based pricing (RBP) policy on pharmaceutical drugs to limit reimbursement costs. Only less expensive and therapeutically effective drugs and not \\\"Cadillac\\\" versions of chemically similar drugs would be reimbursed. The effect of the imminent implementation of this policy on seniors and clinicians (physicians, pharmacists, and various medical specialists) was explored through focus groups. Although the topic was RBP, the overwhelming majority of responses were concerned with various aspects of physician-patient interactions. Most seniors supported the RBP initiative and viewed excessive profits for pharmaceutical corporations as wasteful. Many seniors wished to be more involved in deciding treatment possibilities and to be better informed. In contrast, the clinicians viewed the policy as interference and a restriction of their authority, preferring a more collaborative educative approach to changes in drug prescribing Implications of these divergent views are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Applied Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489801700303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489801700303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

不列颠哥伦比亚省政府制定了药品参考定价(RBP)政策,以限制报销成本。只有较便宜和治疗有效的药物,而不是化学类似药物的“凯迪拉克”版本,才会得到报销。通过焦点小组探讨了即将实施的这项政策对老年人和临床医生(医生、药剂师和各种医学专家)的影响。虽然主题是RBP,但绝大多数回答都涉及医患互动的各个方面。大多数老年人支持RBP倡议,并认为制药公司的过度利润是浪费。许多老年人希望更多地参与决定治疗的可能性,并获得更好的信息。相反,临床医生认为该政策是对其权威的干扰和限制,他们更倾向于采用一种更具协作性的教育方法来改变药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicians' and Seniors' Views of Reference- Based Pricing: Two Sides of a Coin
The government of British Columbia instituted a reference-based pricing (RBP) policy on pharmaceutical drugs to limit reimbursement costs. Only less expensive and therapeutically effective drugs and not "Cadillac" versions of chemically similar drugs would be reimbursed. The effect of the imminent implementation of this policy on seniors and clinicians (physicians, pharmacists, and various medical specialists) was explored through focus groups. Although the topic was RBP, the overwhelming majority of responses were concerned with various aspects of physician-patient interactions. Most seniors supported the RBP initiative and viewed excessive profits for pharmaceutical corporations as wasteful. Many seniors wished to be more involved in deciding treatment possibilities and to be better informed. In contrast, the clinicians viewed the policy as interference and a restriction of their authority, preferring a more collaborative educative approach to changes in drug prescribing Implications of these divergent views are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信