刑事立案阶段的“非接触”盗窃资格问题

O. M. Ivanova, M. G. Ivanov
{"title":"刑事立案阶段的“非接触”盗窃资格问题","authors":"O. M. Ivanova, M. G. Ivanov","doi":"10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the features of qualification of thefts and fraud committed using information and communication technologies at the stage of criminal proceedings. The structure of cybercrimes is mainly represented by property abuse, in particular, «contactless» thefts committed via the Internet, mobile communications, using bank cards. The specificity of these crimes lies in the fact that non-cash, electronic money is the subject of theft. The main difference from the traditional understanding of the subject of theft is its incorporeal essence. The opinion is substantiated that the conceptual and categorical apparatus of theft of someone else's property due to the inclusion in its volume of digital, electronic money (cryptocurrencies, bitcoins) has somewhat expanded. It is this feature that affects the impossibility of using the «generally accepted» model for conducting a pre-investigation check and making a decision to initiate a criminal case. The issues of qualification of the theft and determination of the territory of investigation when deciding to initiate a criminal case remain controversial.","PeriodicalId":262841,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROBLEM OF QUALIFICATION «CONTACTLESS» THEFT AT THE STAGE OF INITIATING CRIMINAL CASES\",\"authors\":\"O. M. Ivanova, M. G. Ivanov\",\"doi\":\"10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the features of qualification of thefts and fraud committed using information and communication technologies at the stage of criminal proceedings. The structure of cybercrimes is mainly represented by property abuse, in particular, «contactless» thefts committed via the Internet, mobile communications, using bank cards. The specificity of these crimes lies in the fact that non-cash, electronic money is the subject of theft. The main difference from the traditional understanding of the subject of theft is its incorporeal essence. The opinion is substantiated that the conceptual and categorical apparatus of theft of someone else's property due to the inclusion in its volume of digital, electronic money (cryptocurrencies, bitcoins) has somewhat expanded. It is this feature that affects the impossibility of using the «generally accepted» model for conducting a pre-investigation check and making a decision to initiate a criminal case. The issues of qualification of the theft and determination of the territory of investigation when deciding to initiate a criminal case remain controversial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of the Russian University of Cooperation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52623/2227-4383-3-45-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了在刑事诉讼阶段利用信息通信技术实施盗窃和诈骗的资格特点。网络犯罪的结构主要以财产滥用为代表,特别是通过互联网,移动通信,使用银行卡进行的“非接触式”盗窃。这些犯罪的特殊性在于,非现金、电子货币是盗窃的对象。盗窃主体与传统理解的主要区别在于其非物质性。这一观点得到证实,由于数字、电子货币(加密货币、比特币)的数量增加,盗窃他人财产的概念和分类手段有所扩大。正是这一特点影响了不可能使用“普遍接受的”模式进行调查前检查和决定提起刑事案件。在决定提起刑事案件时,盗窃的资格和确定调查范围的问题仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PROBLEM OF QUALIFICATION «CONTACTLESS» THEFT AT THE STAGE OF INITIATING CRIMINAL CASES
The article discusses the features of qualification of thefts and fraud committed using information and communication technologies at the stage of criminal proceedings. The structure of cybercrimes is mainly represented by property abuse, in particular, «contactless» thefts committed via the Internet, mobile communications, using bank cards. The specificity of these crimes lies in the fact that non-cash, electronic money is the subject of theft. The main difference from the traditional understanding of the subject of theft is its incorporeal essence. The opinion is substantiated that the conceptual and categorical apparatus of theft of someone else's property due to the inclusion in its volume of digital, electronic money (cryptocurrencies, bitcoins) has somewhat expanded. It is this feature that affects the impossibility of using the «generally accepted» model for conducting a pre-investigation check and making a decision to initiate a criminal case. The issues of qualification of the theft and determination of the territory of investigation when deciding to initiate a criminal case remain controversial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信