“雇主”一词的当代概念

M. Dragičević
{"title":"“雇主”一词的当代概念","authors":"M. Dragičević","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn1-38705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary labour legislation, as a rule, provides the definition of the term \"employer\". While the reason for defining the concept of \"an employee\" rests on the need to determine the personal field of application of labour legislation, the essence of providing a legal definition of the term \"employer\" is to identify the entity that is responsible for fulfilling the obligations towards employees and other temporarilly engaged individuals, as well as their unions and other representation insitutions. Despite the importance of providing an accurate definition, comparative labour legislation can barely offer a classification of the term \"employer\" which indicates that the legislation bodies have managed to overcome the circular (idem per idem) definition. Additionally, the present definitions are not adjusted to triangular (and multilateral) labour-generated relations. Consequently, in order to harmonize the legal framework with the changes which occur in economic reality, an increasing number of labour law systems initiate the process of introducing a new legal model of plural-employer. In that context, the author of this paper first considers the need to re-conceptualize the term \"employer\" and analyzes the current unitary and (new) plural-employer conceptions of this term. Finally, using the example of digital platforms, the author demonstrates the inadequacy of the existing legal definitions of the concept \"employer\" and emphasizes the need for adopting new ones which are more adjusted to the labour market realities.","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary conceptions of the term \\\"employer\\\"\",\"authors\":\"M. Dragičević\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zrpfn1-38705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contemporary labour legislation, as a rule, provides the definition of the term \\\"employer\\\". While the reason for defining the concept of \\\"an employee\\\" rests on the need to determine the personal field of application of labour legislation, the essence of providing a legal definition of the term \\\"employer\\\" is to identify the entity that is responsible for fulfilling the obligations towards employees and other temporarilly engaged individuals, as well as their unions and other representation insitutions. Despite the importance of providing an accurate definition, comparative labour legislation can barely offer a classification of the term \\\"employer\\\" which indicates that the legislation bodies have managed to overcome the circular (idem per idem) definition. Additionally, the present definitions are not adjusted to triangular (and multilateral) labour-generated relations. Consequently, in order to harmonize the legal framework with the changes which occur in economic reality, an increasing number of labour law systems initiate the process of introducing a new legal model of plural-employer. In that context, the author of this paper first considers the need to re-conceptualize the term \\\"employer\\\" and analyzes the current unitary and (new) plural-employer conceptions of this term. Finally, using the example of digital platforms, the author demonstrates the inadequacy of the existing legal definitions of the concept \\\"employer\\\" and emphasizes the need for adopting new ones which are more adjusted to the labour market realities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-38705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-38705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代劳工立法通常规定了“雇主”一词的定义。虽然定义“雇员”概念的原因在于需要确定适用劳工立法的个人领域,但提供“雇主”一词的法律定义的实质是确定负责履行对雇员和其他临时雇用的个人及其工会和其他代表机构的义务的实体。尽管提供一个准确的定义很重要,但比较劳工立法几乎不能对“雇主”一词进行分类,这表明立法机构已经设法克服了循环(逐概念)定义。此外,目前的定义没有调整到三角(和多边)劳动关系。因此,为了使法律框架与经济现实中发生的变化相协调,越来越多的劳工法制度开始采用多雇主的新法律模式。在此背景下,本文的作者首先考虑了重新定义“雇主”一词的必要性,并分析了当前“雇主”一词的单一和(新的)多元概念。最后,作者以数字平台为例,论证了“雇主”概念的现有法律定义的不足,并强调需要采用更适应劳动力市场现实的新定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary conceptions of the term "employer"
The contemporary labour legislation, as a rule, provides the definition of the term "employer". While the reason for defining the concept of "an employee" rests on the need to determine the personal field of application of labour legislation, the essence of providing a legal definition of the term "employer" is to identify the entity that is responsible for fulfilling the obligations towards employees and other temporarilly engaged individuals, as well as their unions and other representation insitutions. Despite the importance of providing an accurate definition, comparative labour legislation can barely offer a classification of the term "employer" which indicates that the legislation bodies have managed to overcome the circular (idem per idem) definition. Additionally, the present definitions are not adjusted to triangular (and multilateral) labour-generated relations. Consequently, in order to harmonize the legal framework with the changes which occur in economic reality, an increasing number of labour law systems initiate the process of introducing a new legal model of plural-employer. In that context, the author of this paper first considers the need to re-conceptualize the term "employer" and analyzes the current unitary and (new) plural-employer conceptions of this term. Finally, using the example of digital platforms, the author demonstrates the inadequacy of the existing legal definitions of the concept "employer" and emphasizes the need for adopting new ones which are more adjusted to the labour market realities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信