范海勒水平下几何课程的修改与课程改革的关系

Anna Rékasi, C. Szabó
{"title":"范海勒水平下几何课程的修改与课程改革的关系","authors":"Anna Rékasi, C. Szabó","doi":"10.37626/ga9783959872003.0.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the level of geometry education in mathematics education in Hungary is investigated. The relationship between the National Core Curriculum, the Framework Curriculum and the final exam is analyzed from the geometry point of view via the Van Hiele levels as a tool for comparison. It is observed that the geometry problems on the final exams do not follow the level prescribed by the National Core Curriculum. We compare these observations with the results of the Usiskin-test of first year preservice math teacher students.","PeriodicalId":200495,"journal":{"name":"Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum geometrischen Denken","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modification of the geometry curriculum in relation to the curriculum reform in the light of the Van Hiele levels\",\"authors\":\"Anna Rékasi, C. Szabó\",\"doi\":\"10.37626/ga9783959872003.0.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the level of geometry education in mathematics education in Hungary is investigated. The relationship between the National Core Curriculum, the Framework Curriculum and the final exam is analyzed from the geometry point of view via the Van Hiele levels as a tool for comparison. It is observed that the geometry problems on the final exams do not follow the level prescribed by the National Core Curriculum. We compare these observations with the results of the Usiskin-test of first year preservice math teacher students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum geometrischen Denken\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum geometrischen Denken\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959872003.0.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretische und empirische Analysen zum geometrischen Denken","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37626/ga9783959872003.0.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对匈牙利数学教育中的几何教育水平进行了调查。通过范希勒水平作为比较工具,从几何角度分析了国家核心课程、框架课程与期末考试之间的关系。据观察,期末考试中的几何问题不符合国家核心课程规定的水平。我们将这些观察结果与usiskin测试的结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modification of the geometry curriculum in relation to the curriculum reform in the light of the Van Hiele levels
In this paper the level of geometry education in mathematics education in Hungary is investigated. The relationship between the National Core Curriculum, the Framework Curriculum and the final exam is analyzed from the geometry point of view via the Van Hiele levels as a tool for comparison. It is observed that the geometry problems on the final exams do not follow the level prescribed by the National Core Curriculum. We compare these observations with the results of the Usiskin-test of first year preservice math teacher students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信