部分遮阳条件下PV系统萤火虫算法与粒子群优化的MPPT性能比较

Eva Jamiyanti, D. Setiawan, Bambang Sujanarko
{"title":"部分遮阳条件下PV系统萤火虫算法与粒子群优化的MPPT性能比较","authors":"Eva Jamiyanti, D. Setiawan, Bambang Sujanarko","doi":"10.1109/ISITIA59021.2023.10221133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In essence, the PV energy distributed directly to the demand is only sometimes in the optimal condition. If the irradiance or temperature received by the PV changes, this could result from a cloud obscuring the sun or other factors. Partial shading of PV can have a significant impact on its power output. Thus, the energy or power supplied to the burden varies, and even the produced energy may not be optimal. A particular control method is required for the most significant quantity of power. Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is a technique that can be utilized to optimize the PV energy output. Sadly, the practices employed to date are typically entangled in local peaks and extended periods of convergence. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Firefly Algorithm (FA) are two heuristic control methods that can address the shortcomings of earlier techniques. This paper describes the benefits and drawbacks of PSO and FA in monitoring optimum PV power under partial shading conditions. Simulation results indicate that the FA algorithm is more reliable than the PSO algorithm in monitoring, with a success rate of 98.9 and 99.7% and a failure rate of approximately 1.3%. In this instance, FA is 1.96 percent more effective than PSO. PSO is about 0.33% quicker at monitoring.","PeriodicalId":116682,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of MPPT Performance Between Firefly Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for PV Systems in Partial Shading Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Eva Jamiyanti, D. Setiawan, Bambang Sujanarko\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISITIA59021.2023.10221133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In essence, the PV energy distributed directly to the demand is only sometimes in the optimal condition. If the irradiance or temperature received by the PV changes, this could result from a cloud obscuring the sun or other factors. Partial shading of PV can have a significant impact on its power output. Thus, the energy or power supplied to the burden varies, and even the produced energy may not be optimal. A particular control method is required for the most significant quantity of power. Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is a technique that can be utilized to optimize the PV energy output. Sadly, the practices employed to date are typically entangled in local peaks and extended periods of convergence. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Firefly Algorithm (FA) are two heuristic control methods that can address the shortcomings of earlier techniques. This paper describes the benefits and drawbacks of PSO and FA in monitoring optimum PV power under partial shading conditions. Simulation results indicate that the FA algorithm is more reliable than the PSO algorithm in monitoring, with a success rate of 98.9 and 99.7% and a failure rate of approximately 1.3%. In this instance, FA is 1.96 percent more effective than PSO. PSO is about 0.33% quicker at monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":116682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA59021.2023.10221133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA59021.2023.10221133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从本质上讲,直接分配给需求的光伏能量只是有时处于最优状态。如果PV接收到的辐照度或温度发生变化,这可能是由于云层遮挡太阳或其他因素造成的。光伏的部分遮阳会对其功率输出产生重大影响。因此,提供给负荷的能量或功率是变化的,甚至产生的能量也可能不是最优的。对于最显著的功率量,需要一种特殊的控制方法。最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)是一种用于优化光伏发电能量输出的技术。遗憾的是,迄今为止所采用的实践通常都纠缠于局部峰值和长时间的收敛。粒子群优化(PSO)和萤火虫算法(FA)是两种启发式控制方法,可以解决早期技术的不足。本文介绍了PSO和FA在部分遮阳条件下监测最佳光伏功率的优点和缺点。仿真结果表明,FA算法比PSO算法更可靠,其监测成功率分别为98.9%和99.7%,故障率约为1.3%。在这种情况下,FA比PSO有效1.96%。PSO的监控速度大约快0.33%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of MPPT Performance Between Firefly Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for PV Systems in Partial Shading Conditions
In essence, the PV energy distributed directly to the demand is only sometimes in the optimal condition. If the irradiance or temperature received by the PV changes, this could result from a cloud obscuring the sun or other factors. Partial shading of PV can have a significant impact on its power output. Thus, the energy or power supplied to the burden varies, and even the produced energy may not be optimal. A particular control method is required for the most significant quantity of power. Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is a technique that can be utilized to optimize the PV energy output. Sadly, the practices employed to date are typically entangled in local peaks and extended periods of convergence. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Firefly Algorithm (FA) are two heuristic control methods that can address the shortcomings of earlier techniques. This paper describes the benefits and drawbacks of PSO and FA in monitoring optimum PV power under partial shading conditions. Simulation results indicate that the FA algorithm is more reliable than the PSO algorithm in monitoring, with a success rate of 98.9 and 99.7% and a failure rate of approximately 1.3%. In this instance, FA is 1.96 percent more effective than PSO. PSO is about 0.33% quicker at monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信