尼日利亚高原州Bassa地方政府区felder-silverman学习方式对中学生物理成绩的影响

M. Josiah, Kinnayi Thompson Jesse, M. Mankilik
{"title":"尼日利亚高原州Bassa地方政府区felder-silverman学习方式对中学生物理成绩的影响","authors":"M. Josiah, Kinnayi Thompson Jesse, M. Mankilik","doi":"10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study determined the achievement of students in physics when exposed to Felder-Silverman’s learning styles, amongst others.\nMethodology: The separate-sample pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The population was 419 senior secondary two (SSII) students offering physics in 31 schools in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria.  A sample of 88 students obtained from four intact classes were used. The instruments used were the Index of Learning Style Questionnaire (ILSQ) and Physics Achievement Test (PAT). Construct validity and content validity were respectively performed on the ILSQ and PAT. The test-retest method was used to obtain the reliability coefficient of ILSQ as 0.86. Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was used to obtain the coefficient of PAT as 0.81. ILSQ was administered, before PAT, as pre-test so as to place students into the learning styles. After teaching for four weeks, using the lecture method, PAT was administered as post-test. The mean and ANCOVA were respectively used to answer the research questions and hypotheses.\nResults: Visual/verbal and sensing/intuitive learners achieved higher than the active/reflective and sequential/global learners, amongst others.\nFindings: A major finding was that sensing/intuitive and visual/verbal learning styles had significant effect on students’ achievement but active/reflective and sequential/global learning styles had insignificant effect.\nRecommendations/Classroom Implications: Students should be encouraged to put their learning styles into use. When students are exposed to the different dimensions of learning styles, their achievement in Physics may be improved.","PeriodicalId":252711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of felder-silverman’s learning styles on students’ achievement in secondary school Physics in Bassa local government area, Plateau state, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"M. Josiah, Kinnayi Thompson Jesse, M. Mankilik\",\"doi\":\"10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The study determined the achievement of students in physics when exposed to Felder-Silverman’s learning styles, amongst others.\\nMethodology: The separate-sample pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The population was 419 senior secondary two (SSII) students offering physics in 31 schools in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria.  A sample of 88 students obtained from four intact classes were used. The instruments used were the Index of Learning Style Questionnaire (ILSQ) and Physics Achievement Test (PAT). Construct validity and content validity were respectively performed on the ILSQ and PAT. The test-retest method was used to obtain the reliability coefficient of ILSQ as 0.86. Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was used to obtain the coefficient of PAT as 0.81. ILSQ was administered, before PAT, as pre-test so as to place students into the learning styles. After teaching for four weeks, using the lecture method, PAT was administered as post-test. The mean and ANCOVA were respectively used to answer the research questions and hypotheses.\\nResults: Visual/verbal and sensing/intuitive learners achieved higher than the active/reflective and sequential/global learners, amongst others.\\nFindings: A major finding was that sensing/intuitive and visual/verbal learning styles had significant effect on students’ achievement but active/reflective and sequential/global learning styles had insignificant effect.\\nRecommendations/Classroom Implications: Students should be encouraged to put their learning styles into use. When students are exposed to the different dimensions of learning styles, their achievement in Physics may be improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47434/JEREDA.1.2.2020.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究确定了学生在接触费尔德-西尔弗曼的学习方式以及其他学习方式时在物理方面的成就。方法:采用独立样本前测、后测准实验研究设计。人口为419名高中二年级(SSII)学生,在尼日利亚巴萨地方政府区的31所学校提供物理课程。从四个完整的班级中抽取了88名学生作为样本。使用的工具是学习风格指数问卷(ILSQ)和物理成就测验(PAT)。对ILSQ和PAT分别进行结构效度和内容效度测试。采用重测法得到ILSQ的信度系数为0.86。采用Kuder-Richardson公式20,得到PAT系数为0.81。在PAT之前进行ILSQ作为前测试,以使学生进入学习风格。教学4周后,采用授课法,PAT作为后测。分别采用均值和方差分析来回答研究问题和假设。结果:视觉/语言和感知/直觉学习者的成绩高于主动/反思和顺序/全局学习者。研究发现:感觉/直觉和视觉/语言学习风格对学生的学习成绩有显著影响,而主动/反思和顺序/全局学习风格对学生的学习成绩影响不显著。建议/课堂启示:应鼓励学生运用自己的学习方式。当学生接触到不同维度的学习方式时,他们在物理方面的成绩可能会有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of felder-silverman’s learning styles on students’ achievement in secondary school Physics in Bassa local government area, Plateau state, Nigeria
Purpose: The study determined the achievement of students in physics when exposed to Felder-Silverman’s learning styles, amongst others. Methodology: The separate-sample pre-test, post-test quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The population was 419 senior secondary two (SSII) students offering physics in 31 schools in Bassa Local Government Area, Nigeria.  A sample of 88 students obtained from four intact classes were used. The instruments used were the Index of Learning Style Questionnaire (ILSQ) and Physics Achievement Test (PAT). Construct validity and content validity were respectively performed on the ILSQ and PAT. The test-retest method was used to obtain the reliability coefficient of ILSQ as 0.86. Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was used to obtain the coefficient of PAT as 0.81. ILSQ was administered, before PAT, as pre-test so as to place students into the learning styles. After teaching for four weeks, using the lecture method, PAT was administered as post-test. The mean and ANCOVA were respectively used to answer the research questions and hypotheses. Results: Visual/verbal and sensing/intuitive learners achieved higher than the active/reflective and sequential/global learners, amongst others. Findings: A major finding was that sensing/intuitive and visual/verbal learning styles had significant effect on students’ achievement but active/reflective and sequential/global learning styles had insignificant effect. Recommendations/Classroom Implications: Students should be encouraged to put their learning styles into use. When students are exposed to the different dimensions of learning styles, their achievement in Physics may be improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信