Zoja Bruģe
{"title":"Tiesību palīgavotu publicēšanas nepieciešamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","authors":"Zoja Bruģe","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of subsidiary sources of law (diversity) ensures quality decision-making. The use of subsidiary sources of law is affected by their availability. One of the subsidiary sources of law is the decision on the contested administrative act. This article analyses the issue of these decisions and making available thereof. It is concluded in the article that the decision on the contested administrative act is not publicly available, and this is an obstacle for its use in making of new decisions. To remove this obstacle, to promote the openness of public administration and to solve potential dispute in pre-trial process, the article suggests publishing the decision on the contested administrative act.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辅助法律来源的使用(多样性)保证了高质量的决策。辅助法律渊源的使用受其可得性的影响。对争议行政行为的裁决是辅助法律渊源之一。本文分析了这些决定的问题及其实施。该条的结论是,关于有争议的行政行为的决定没有公开,这是在作出新决定时使用它的一个障碍。为消除这一障碍,促进公共行政公开,解决审前程序中可能存在的争议,建议将争议行政行为的判决予以公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tiesību palīgavotu publicēšanas nepieciešamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī
Use of subsidiary sources of law (diversity) ensures quality decision-making. The use of subsidiary sources of law is affected by their availability. One of the subsidiary sources of law is the decision on the contested administrative act. This article analyses the issue of these decisions and making available thereof. It is concluded in the article that the decision on the contested administrative act is not publicly available, and this is an obstacle for its use in making of new decisions. To remove this obstacle, to promote the openness of public administration and to solve potential dispute in pre-trial process, the article suggests publishing the decision on the contested administrative act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信