思维习惯:凡勃伦的本能与制度动力学

Philip Lawton
{"title":"思维习惯:凡勃伦的本能与制度动力学","authors":"Philip Lawton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3285890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) sought to align economics with modern scientific thinking by recasting it as an evolutionary theory of the process of cultural development that unfolds in response to changing material and social conditions. Central to this program was his conception of the interplay between the instincts that define human nature and the institutions that give force to inherited ideas. This short paper characterizes the innately human propensities that find expression as communities struggle to survive in the physical environment, and describes how, in Veblen’s view, those instincts shape ways of thinking, or institutions, which prove in turn to be efficient factors of selection. In “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Veblen said that economic change “is always in the last resort a change in habits of thought.”","PeriodicalId":253619,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics eJournal","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habits of Thought: Veblen's Dynamics of Instinct and Institution\",\"authors\":\"Philip Lawton\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3285890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) sought to align economics with modern scientific thinking by recasting it as an evolutionary theory of the process of cultural development that unfolds in response to changing material and social conditions. Central to this program was his conception of the interplay between the instincts that define human nature and the institutions that give force to inherited ideas. This short paper characterizes the innately human propensities that find expression as communities struggle to survive in the physical environment, and describes how, in Veblen’s view, those instincts shape ways of thinking, or institutions, which prove in turn to be efficient factors of selection. In “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Veblen said that economic change “is always in the last resort a change in habits of thought.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":253619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3285890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3285890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

凡勃伦(Thorstein Veblen, 1857-1929)试图将经济学与现代科学思想结合起来,将其重塑为一种文化发展过程的进化理论,这种发展过程是对不断变化的物质和社会条件的反应。这个计划的核心是他关于定义人性的本能和赋予继承思想力量的制度之间相互作用的概念。这篇短文描述了人类在自然环境中挣扎求生时表现出来的内在倾向,并描述了在凡勃伦看来,这些本能是如何塑造思维方式或制度的,而这些思维方式或制度反过来又被证明是有效的选择因素。在《为什么经济学不是一门进化的科学?》凡勃伦说,经济变革"最终总是思维习惯的改变"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Habits of Thought: Veblen's Dynamics of Instinct and Institution
Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) sought to align economics with modern scientific thinking by recasting it as an evolutionary theory of the process of cultural development that unfolds in response to changing material and social conditions. Central to this program was his conception of the interplay between the instincts that define human nature and the institutions that give force to inherited ideas. This short paper characterizes the innately human propensities that find expression as communities struggle to survive in the physical environment, and describes how, in Veblen’s view, those instincts shape ways of thinking, or institutions, which prove in turn to be efficient factors of selection. In “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Veblen said that economic change “is always in the last resort a change in habits of thought.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信