角反射器RCS计算数值方法的比较

2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC) Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033445

N. K. Sahoo, R. K. Parida, D. C. Panda

{"title":"角反射器RCS计算数值方法的比较","authors":"N. K. Sahoo, R. K. Parida, D. C. Panda","doi":"10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RCS of dihedral and trihedral corner reflectors are computed using different numerical methods. Performance of the algorithms is compared in terms of memory, computational time and the number of cell requirement. It is found that the FDTD method utilizes less computational resources compared to MOM and FEM in RCS computation of corner reflectors.","PeriodicalId":222759,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Numerical Methods in RCS Computation of Corner Reflectors\",\"authors\":\"N. K. Sahoo, R. K. Parida, D. C. Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RCS of dihedral and trihedral corner reflectors are computed using different numerical methods. Performance of the algorithms is compared in terms of memory, computational time and the number of cell requirement. It is found that the FDTD method utilizes less computational resources compared to MOM and FEM in RCS computation of corner reflectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AESPC44649.2018.9033445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

采用不同的数值方法计算了二面体角反射器和三面体角反射器的RCS。从内存、计算时间和单元个数等方面比较了两种算法的性能。结果表明，在角反射器的RCS计算中，FDTD法比MOM法和FEM法节省了更少的计算资源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of Numerical Methods in RCS Computation of Corner Reflectors

RCS of dihedral and trihedral corner reflectors are computed using different numerical methods. Performance of the algorithms is compared in terms of memory, computational time and the number of cell requirement. It is found that the FDTD method utilizes less computational resources compared to MOM and FEM in RCS computation of corner reflectors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2018 International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics, Signal Processing and Communication (AESPC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量