新普遍主义:术语分类与方法范式

L. Zakharova, T. Kononova, O. Lazareva, E. Akulich, O. Goreva
{"title":"新普遍主义:术语分类与方法范式","authors":"L. Zakharova, T. Kononova, O. Lazareva, E. Akulich, O. Goreva","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.200723.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research is to analyze universals from the paradigmatic and interdisciplinary points of view. The authors give their own concept of universalism, based on the epistemological approach and backed by history, philosophy, and cultural studies. Undoubtedly, universals reflect an image of a person of a historically definite type of culture. They represent a person’s place in the world, social relations and spiritual life. These parameters are changeable, but at the same time they can be permanent. The article shows the categorization of the concept of universalism and underlines the variety of its use. Universals are not the same in different cultures, but they are classified on the similar basis. The authors name this principle of classification a general denominator of cultures, which includes ideology, values, symbols, and meanings. Universals vary in their content, but have the same form in various cultures. The authors of the article argue that the border between “universals of culture” and “universals of civilization” is unstable and determined by a situation. The article proves the thesis that the system of universals is not closed. Due to the development and the processes of person’s adaptation to the reality, some universals disappear; others emerge. The authors believe that there are also eternal, permanent universals, which express the main needs of a person.","PeriodicalId":191967,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Universalism: Categorization of Terms and Paradigm of Approaches\",\"authors\":\"L. Zakharova, T. Kononova, O. Lazareva, E. Akulich, O. Goreva\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.200723.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the research is to analyze universals from the paradigmatic and interdisciplinary points of view. The authors give their own concept of universalism, based on the epistemological approach and backed by history, philosophy, and cultural studies. Undoubtedly, universals reflect an image of a person of a historically definite type of culture. They represent a person’s place in the world, social relations and spiritual life. These parameters are changeable, but at the same time they can be permanent. The article shows the categorization of the concept of universalism and underlines the variety of its use. Universals are not the same in different cultures, but they are classified on the similar basis. The authors name this principle of classification a general denominator of cultures, which includes ideology, values, symbols, and meanings. Universals vary in their content, but have the same form in various cultures. The authors of the article argue that the border between “universals of culture” and “universals of civilization” is unstable and determined by a situation. The article proves the thesis that the system of universals is not closed. Due to the development and the processes of person’s adaptation to the reality, some universals disappear; others emerge. The authors believe that there are also eternal, permanent universals, which express the main needs of a person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Philosophy of Education, Law and Science in the Era of Globalization (PELSEG 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是从范式和跨学科的角度分析共性。作者在认识论的基础上,以历史、哲学和文化研究为基础,提出了自己的普遍主义概念。毫无疑问,共性反映了一个人在历史上确定的文化类型的形象。它们代表了一个人在世界上的地位、社会关系和精神生活。这些参数是可变的,但同时也可以是永久的。文章对普遍主义概念进行了分类,并强调了其用法的多样性。在不同的文化中,共性是不一样的,但它们是在相似的基础上分类的。作者将这一分类原则称为文化的总分母,其中包括意识形态、价值观、符号和意义。共性的内容各不相同,但在不同的文化中具有相同的形式。文章的作者认为,“文化共性”和“文明共性”之间的边界是不稳定的,是由一种情况决定的。本文论证了共相体系不是封闭的这一命题。由于人的发展和对现实的适应过程,一些共性消失了;别人出现。作者认为,也有永恒的、永久的共性,它们表达了一个人的主要需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Universalism: Categorization of Terms and Paradigm of Approaches
The purpose of the research is to analyze universals from the paradigmatic and interdisciplinary points of view. The authors give their own concept of universalism, based on the epistemological approach and backed by history, philosophy, and cultural studies. Undoubtedly, universals reflect an image of a person of a historically definite type of culture. They represent a person’s place in the world, social relations and spiritual life. These parameters are changeable, but at the same time they can be permanent. The article shows the categorization of the concept of universalism and underlines the variety of its use. Universals are not the same in different cultures, but they are classified on the similar basis. The authors name this principle of classification a general denominator of cultures, which includes ideology, values, symbols, and meanings. Universals vary in their content, but have the same form in various cultures. The authors of the article argue that the border between “universals of culture” and “universals of civilization” is unstable and determined by a situation. The article proves the thesis that the system of universals is not closed. Due to the development and the processes of person’s adaptation to the reality, some universals disappear; others emerge. The authors believe that there are also eternal, permanent universals, which express the main needs of a person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信