{"title":"数学网数学期刊合著情况分析。俄文","authors":"E. A. Znamenskaya, A. Pechnikov, D. E. Chebukov","doi":"10.20948/abrau-2022-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.","PeriodicalId":277406,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of co-authorship in mathematical journals of Math-Net.Ru\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Znamenskaya, A. Pechnikov, D. E. Chebukov\",\"doi\":\"10.20948/abrau-2022-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20948/abrau-2022-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20948/abrau-2022-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of co-authorship in mathematical journals of Math-Net.Ru
Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.