数学网数学期刊合著情况分析。俄文

E. A. Znamenskaya, A. Pechnikov, D. E. Chebukov
{"title":"数学网数学期刊合著情况分析。俄文","authors":"E. A. Znamenskaya, A. Pechnikov, D. E. Chebukov","doi":"10.20948/abrau-2022-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.","PeriodicalId":277406,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of co-authorship in mathematical journals of Math-Net.Ru\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Znamenskaya, A. Pechnikov, D. E. Chebukov\",\"doi\":\"10.20948/abrau-2022-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20948/abrau-2022-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 24th Scientific Conference “Scientific Services & Internet – 2022”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20948/abrau-2022-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以全俄数学门户网站matth - net中存储的期刊数据为基础,研究了数学论文的合著问题。从2000年到2020年期间为Ru。调查显示,大多数文章(超过59%)是由一个作者撰写的,39%的文章是由2到4个共同作者撰写的。2%的文章对应于由5至44名共同作者组成的科学小组。这种合作的结构表明,已知的故意增加合作的趋势并不符合我们的研究对象。我们发现,当合著者数量达到4时,合著图的主要特征,如作为最大连接分量一部分的顶点的一小部分,直径和平均路径长度是稳定的。与将10名以上共同作者撰写的文章分配到单独类别的建议不同,在我们的工作中,我们可以将5名共同作者撰写的出版物分配到这样一个单一类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of co-authorship in mathematical journals of Math-Net.Ru
Problems of co-authorship in mathematical articles were studied on the basis of journals data stored in the All-Russian mathematical portal Math-Net.Ru for the period from 2000 to 2020. The investigation shows that the most articles (more than 59%) are written by a single author, 39% of articles are written by a group from 2 to 4 co-authors. 2% of articles correspond to scientific groups consisting from 5 to 44 co-authors. Such a structure of coauthorship shows that the known tendency of deliberate growing co-authorship does not correspond to our object of investigation. We show that the main features of the co-authorship graph, such as a fraction of the vertices as a part of the maximal connected component, diameter and the average path length are stabilized once the number of co-authors reach 4. Unlike the recommendations to allocate articles written by more than 10 co-authors to a separate category, in our work we can allocate publications written by 5 co-authors to such a single category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信