视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术在阴茎癌中的应用

E. Metelkova, P. Nesterov, E. V. Gurin, A. V. Ukharskiy
{"title":"视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术在阴茎癌中的应用","authors":"E. Metelkova, P. Nesterov, E. V. Gurin, A. V. Ukharskiy","doi":"10.17650/726-9776-2022-18-4-72-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Dissection of inguinal lymph nodes is an important method of treatment of invasive and locally advanced penile cancer. Unfortunately, the procedure is associated with very high complication rate exceeding 50 %.Aim. To perform retrospective comparative analysis of oncological outcomes, intraoperative and early postoperative complications of open and endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in treatment of patients with penile cancer.Materials and methods. Treatment outcomes of 64 patients with penile cancer who underwent open or video endoscopic lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Primary and secondary surgical treatment outcomes were evaluated.Results. Open inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed in 54 patients, video endoscopic in 10. Analysis of primary surgical results showed a significant (3-fold) reduction of the duration of lymphorrhea and the duration of hospitalization (2-fold) in patients of the video endoscopic lymphadenectomy group. There was no difference in the number of removed lymph nodes in the two types of surgeries. Average operative time for video endoscopic lymphadenectomy was 15–20 % longer than operative time of open intervention. Analysis of safety indicators showed that during open surgery, the frequency of wound infection was 24 %, skin flap necrosis – 55.5 %, wound dehiscence – 52 %, lymphedema – 15 %. No such complications were observed in lateral video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.Conclusion. Video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has significant advantages compared to open method in terms of reduction of the rate of surgical complications and duration of hospitalization.","PeriodicalId":216890,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Urology","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in penile cancer\",\"authors\":\"E. Metelkova, P. Nesterov, E. V. Gurin, A. V. Ukharskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/726-9776-2022-18-4-72-80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Dissection of inguinal lymph nodes is an important method of treatment of invasive and locally advanced penile cancer. Unfortunately, the procedure is associated with very high complication rate exceeding 50 %.Aim. To perform retrospective comparative analysis of oncological outcomes, intraoperative and early postoperative complications of open and endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in treatment of patients with penile cancer.Materials and methods. Treatment outcomes of 64 patients with penile cancer who underwent open or video endoscopic lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Primary and secondary surgical treatment outcomes were evaluated.Results. Open inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed in 54 patients, video endoscopic in 10. Analysis of primary surgical results showed a significant (3-fold) reduction of the duration of lymphorrhea and the duration of hospitalization (2-fold) in patients of the video endoscopic lymphadenectomy group. There was no difference in the number of removed lymph nodes in the two types of surgeries. Average operative time for video endoscopic lymphadenectomy was 15–20 % longer than operative time of open intervention. Analysis of safety indicators showed that during open surgery, the frequency of wound infection was 24 %, skin flap necrosis – 55.5 %, wound dehiscence – 52 %, lymphedema – 15 %. No such complications were observed in lateral video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.Conclusion. Video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has significant advantages compared to open method in terms of reduction of the rate of surgical complications and duration of hospitalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Urology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/726-9776-2022-18-4-72-80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/726-9776-2022-18-4-72-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。腹股沟淋巴结清扫术是治疗侵袭性和局部晚期阴茎癌的重要方法。不幸的是,该手术的并发症发生率非常高,超过50%。目的:回顾性比较分析开放式和内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗阴茎癌患者的肿瘤预后、术中及术后早期并发症。材料和方法。对64例阴茎癌行开放式或视频内镜下淋巴结切除术的治疗结果进行分析。评估原发性和继发性手术治疗效果。54例行开放式腹股沟淋巴结切除术,10例行内镜下视频淋巴结切除术。初步手术结果分析显示,视频内镜淋巴结切除术组患者的淋巴出血持续时间(3倍)和住院时间(2倍)显著减少。两种手术切除的淋巴结数量没有差异。视频内镜下淋巴结切除术的平均手术时间比开放式干预手术时间长15 - 20%。安全指标分析表明,开放性手术中创面感染发生率为24%,皮瓣坏死发生率为55.5%,创面裂开发生率为52%,淋巴水肿发生率为15%。腹侧内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术未见上述并发症。视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结切除术在减少手术并发症发生率和住院时间方面与开放方法相比具有显著优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in penile cancer
Background. Dissection of inguinal lymph nodes is an important method of treatment of invasive and locally advanced penile cancer. Unfortunately, the procedure is associated with very high complication rate exceeding 50 %.Aim. To perform retrospective comparative analysis of oncological outcomes, intraoperative and early postoperative complications of open and endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in treatment of patients with penile cancer.Materials and methods. Treatment outcomes of 64 patients with penile cancer who underwent open or video endoscopic lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Primary and secondary surgical treatment outcomes were evaluated.Results. Open inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed in 54 patients, video endoscopic in 10. Analysis of primary surgical results showed a significant (3-fold) reduction of the duration of lymphorrhea and the duration of hospitalization (2-fold) in patients of the video endoscopic lymphadenectomy group. There was no difference in the number of removed lymph nodes in the two types of surgeries. Average operative time for video endoscopic lymphadenectomy was 15–20 % longer than operative time of open intervention. Analysis of safety indicators showed that during open surgery, the frequency of wound infection was 24 %, skin flap necrosis – 55.5 %, wound dehiscence – 52 %, lymphedema – 15 %. No such complications were observed in lateral video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.Conclusion. Video endoscopic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy has significant advantages compared to open method in terms of reduction of the rate of surgical complications and duration of hospitalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信