不同英语水平、认知风格和性别学生的计算机支持协作学习

Pei-ling Wang, Hsiao-chien Lee
{"title":"不同英语水平、认知风格和性别学生的计算机支持协作学习","authors":"Pei-ling Wang, Hsiao-chien Lee","doi":"10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research have often suggested that language learners benefited greatly by the collaborative learning. However, it is still unclear whether learners with different English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders profit equally from working in an online collaborative learning environment. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to explore the effectiveness of an inter-school online collaborative learning on students with heterogeneous English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders. Two intact classes of 78 first-year English and non-English majors from two universities participated in the study. During the one-year online collaborative learning, students were divided into 17 groups, and each group was requested to create an e-book. Instruments of the study included the Group Embedded Figure Test and student individual pre/post essays. Two English professors were requested to evaluate student pre/post essays. The results showed that English majors had significant improvement in the post-essay writing, especially in the scores of the content. Non-English majors also improved in their post-essays, but the improvement was not significant. Moreover, field dependent students wrote better in their post essay, while field independent students did not improve and their post-essay scores even declined. Furthermore, female students progressed more than male students. Some research implications were provided to conclude this study.","PeriodicalId":325097,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","volume":"187 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning among Students of Different English Proficiency, Cognitive Styles, and Genders\",\"authors\":\"Pei-ling Wang, Hsiao-chien Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research have often suggested that language learners benefited greatly by the collaborative learning. However, it is still unclear whether learners with different English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders profit equally from working in an online collaborative learning environment. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to explore the effectiveness of an inter-school online collaborative learning on students with heterogeneous English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders. Two intact classes of 78 first-year English and non-English majors from two universities participated in the study. During the one-year online collaborative learning, students were divided into 17 groups, and each group was requested to create an e-book. Instruments of the study included the Group Embedded Figure Test and student individual pre/post essays. Two English professors were requested to evaluate student pre/post essays. The results showed that English majors had significant improvement in the post-essay writing, especially in the scores of the content. Non-English majors also improved in their post-essays, but the improvement was not significant. Moreover, field dependent students wrote better in their post essay, while field independent students did not improve and their post-essay scores even declined. Furthermore, female students progressed more than male students. Some research implications were provided to conclude this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning\",\"volume\":\"187 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/AJEEL.V2I1.738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究经常表明,语言学习者从合作学习中受益匪浅。然而,不同英语水平、认知风格和性别的学习者是否能从在线协作学习环境中获得平等的利益,目前还不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是探讨校际在线协作学习对不同性别、不同认知方式和不同英语水平的学生的有效性。来自两所大学的78名一年级英语和非英语专业的学生参加了这项研究。在为期一年的在线协作学习中,学生被分成17组,每组被要求创作一本电子书。研究工具包括小组嵌入图测试和学生个人前后论文。两位英语教授被要求评估学生的前后论文。结果表明,英语专业的学生在论文后写作方面有明显的提高,尤其是在内容的得分方面。非英语专业学生的论文后成绩也有所提高,但提高并不显著。此外,专业独立的学生在论文中写得更好,而专业独立的学生没有提高,他们的论文分数甚至下降。此外,女生比男生进步更快。在此基础上提出了一些研究启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning among Students of Different English Proficiency, Cognitive Styles, and Genders
Research have often suggested that language learners benefited greatly by the collaborative learning. However, it is still unclear whether learners with different English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders profit equally from working in an online collaborative learning environment. Therefore, the aim of this study attempts to explore the effectiveness of an inter-school online collaborative learning on students with heterogeneous English proficiency, cognitive styles and genders. Two intact classes of 78 first-year English and non-English majors from two universities participated in the study. During the one-year online collaborative learning, students were divided into 17 groups, and each group was requested to create an e-book. Instruments of the study included the Group Embedded Figure Test and student individual pre/post essays. Two English professors were requested to evaluate student pre/post essays. The results showed that English majors had significant improvement in the post-essay writing, especially in the scores of the content. Non-English majors also improved in their post-essays, but the improvement was not significant. Moreover, field dependent students wrote better in their post essay, while field independent students did not improve and their post-essay scores even declined. Furthermore, female students progressed more than male students. Some research implications were provided to conclude this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信