公爵与个人文化

A. Gamberini
{"title":"公爵与个人文化","authors":"A. Gamberini","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198824312.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The great challenge posed by the construction of a state based around a noble and princely structure led first of all to confrontation with those republican ideals that continued to guide large and small communities in their day-to-day operation. Once again, the Visconti and the Sforza did not merely set about seeking a peaceful modus vivendi, but attempted to dismantle competing cultures through the development of an alternative model of social organization, based on distinctions among men. Communitary egalitarianism was opposed by the valorization of individual excellence, which the prince acknowledged on the basis of status, wealth, and local influence. This resulted in a frontal attack on the political subjectivity of the communities, which, however, reacted in different ways in the cities and in the countryside. This chapter focuses on these aspects.","PeriodicalId":308769,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Scholarship Online","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Duke and the Culture of Individual Distinction\",\"authors\":\"A. Gamberini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198824312.003.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The great challenge posed by the construction of a state based around a noble and princely structure led first of all to confrontation with those republican ideals that continued to guide large and small communities in their day-to-day operation. Once again, the Visconti and the Sforza did not merely set about seeking a peaceful modus vivendi, but attempted to dismantle competing cultures through the development of an alternative model of social organization, based on distinctions among men. Communitary egalitarianism was opposed by the valorization of individual excellence, which the prince acknowledged on the basis of status, wealth, and local influence. This resulted in a frontal attack on the political subjectivity of the communities, which, however, reacted in different ways in the cities and in the countryside. This chapter focuses on these aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Scholarship Online\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Scholarship Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198824312.003.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Scholarship Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198824312.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立一个以贵族和王公结构为基础的国家所带来的巨大挑战首先导致了与那些继续指导大小社区日常运作的共和理想的对抗。再一次,维斯康蒂和斯福尔扎不仅开始寻求一种和平的权宜方式,而且试图通过发展一种基于人与人之间差别的社会组织的替代模式来拆除相互竞争的文化。社区平等主义受到个人卓越价值的反对,王子在地位、财富和地方影响力的基础上承认个人卓越。这导致了对社区政治主体性的正面攻击,然而,这在城市和农村以不同的方式作出反应。本章主要讨论这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Duke and the Culture of Individual Distinction
The great challenge posed by the construction of a state based around a noble and princely structure led first of all to confrontation with those republican ideals that continued to guide large and small communities in their day-to-day operation. Once again, the Visconti and the Sforza did not merely set about seeking a peaceful modus vivendi, but attempted to dismantle competing cultures through the development of an alternative model of social organization, based on distinctions among men. Communitary egalitarianism was opposed by the valorization of individual excellence, which the prince acknowledged on the basis of status, wealth, and local influence. This resulted in a frontal attack on the political subjectivity of the communities, which, however, reacted in different ways in the cities and in the countryside. This chapter focuses on these aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信