威拉米特河波浪能的评价

C. Poor, Rachel Anderson, H. Dillon
{"title":"威拉米特河波浪能的评价","authors":"C. Poor, Rachel Anderson, H. Dillon","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-71796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The trend of using larger boats for wake surfing in river systems has caused concern for dock stability, bank erosion, safety of other boaters, and natural resource conservation. This study evaluates the wave energy due to boat traffic in the Newberg Pool of the Willamette River using budget conscious equipment and involving community stakeholders. Low-cost motion activated game cameras were used to record videos of waves when boats passed.\n The video processing was completed using image analysis in the computational tool Matlab. For each image a high-contrast point of reference was used for the tracking, often tape on a dock piling. As the wave or dock moved, the reference point in the image was tracked in Matlab using the maximum or minimum grayscale pixel in a specific part of the image. This calculation allowed the research team to approximate the change in vertical direction in pixels.\n A computational analysis tool was used at 4 sites, 2 in wake surfing zones, 1 in a wake zone, and 1 in a no wake zone, to quantify wave height and period. A total of 8567 videos were collected from the four sites, and 1227 were analyzed. For the wake surfing zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.026 m and 0.149 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 0.905 W/m and 19.2 W/m, respectively. In the wake zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.031 m and 0.137 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 1.405 W/m and 5.74 W/m, respectively. The average wave energy was higher in the wake zone, however, the maximum wave height and the number of boat-caused waves recorded were higher (2984 in the wake surfing zone compared to 1117 in the wake zone) in the wake surfing zone. Cameras were attached to dock pilings which may have resulted in lower values due to the dampening of the dock. Wake surfing was also observed in wake zones, where it is not allowed. This study indicates that the large boats used for wake surfing create larger waves that can potentially cause damage to property along the river and natural resources.\n The processes and procedures used within this research would not have been possible without citizen involvement. The citizens partaking in the research allowed for their property to be used as a heavily monitored site or a self-monitored site. The self-monitored sites were a useful tool in collecting more data.","PeriodicalId":238134,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8B: Energy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Wave Energy on the Willamette River\",\"authors\":\"C. Poor, Rachel Anderson, H. Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-71796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The trend of using larger boats for wake surfing in river systems has caused concern for dock stability, bank erosion, safety of other boaters, and natural resource conservation. This study evaluates the wave energy due to boat traffic in the Newberg Pool of the Willamette River using budget conscious equipment and involving community stakeholders. Low-cost motion activated game cameras were used to record videos of waves when boats passed.\\n The video processing was completed using image analysis in the computational tool Matlab. For each image a high-contrast point of reference was used for the tracking, often tape on a dock piling. As the wave or dock moved, the reference point in the image was tracked in Matlab using the maximum or minimum grayscale pixel in a specific part of the image. This calculation allowed the research team to approximate the change in vertical direction in pixels.\\n A computational analysis tool was used at 4 sites, 2 in wake surfing zones, 1 in a wake zone, and 1 in a no wake zone, to quantify wave height and period. A total of 8567 videos were collected from the four sites, and 1227 were analyzed. For the wake surfing zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.026 m and 0.149 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 0.905 W/m and 19.2 W/m, respectively. In the wake zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.031 m and 0.137 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 1.405 W/m and 5.74 W/m, respectively. The average wave energy was higher in the wake zone, however, the maximum wave height and the number of boat-caused waves recorded were higher (2984 in the wake surfing zone compared to 1117 in the wake zone) in the wake surfing zone. Cameras were attached to dock pilings which may have resulted in lower values due to the dampening of the dock. Wake surfing was also observed in wake zones, where it is not allowed. This study indicates that the large boats used for wake surfing create larger waves that can potentially cause damage to property along the river and natural resources.\\n The processes and procedures used within this research would not have been possible without citizen involvement. The citizens partaking in the research allowed for their property to be used as a heavily monitored site or a self-monitored site. The self-monitored sites were a useful tool in collecting more data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 8B: Energy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 8B: Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8B: Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-71796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在河流系统中使用大型船只进行尾流冲浪的趋势引起了对码头稳定性、河岸侵蚀、其他船只的安全以及自然资源保护的关注。本研究使用预算敏感的设备并涉及社区利益相关者,评估了威拉米特河纽伯格池中船舶交通产生的波浪能。低成本的运动激活游戏摄像机被用来记录船只经过时海浪的视频。视频处理在Matlab计算工具中使用图像分析完成。对于每个图像,使用高对比度的参考点进行跟踪,通常是在码头打桩上。随着波浪或船坞的移动,在Matlab中使用图像特定部分的最大或最小灰度像素来跟踪图像中的参考点。通过这种计算,研究小组可以用像素来近似计算垂直方向的变化。使用计算分析工具对4个站点(2个在尾流冲浪区,1个在尾流区,1个在无尾流区)的波浪高度和周期进行量化。4个站点共收集视频8567个,分析视频1227个。尾流区平均浪高和最大浪高分别为0.026 m和0.149 m,平均浪能和最大浪能分别为0.905 W/m和19.2 W/m。尾流区平均波高和最大波高分别为0.031 m和0.137 m,平均波能和最大波能分别为1.405 W/m和5.74 W/m。尾流区平均波浪能较高,但尾流区记录的最大浪高和船致浪数较高(尾流区为2984次,尾流区为1117次)。摄影机安装在码头桩上,可能由于码头受潮而导致数值较低。尾流冲浪也被观察到在尾流区,那里是不允许的。这项研究表明,用于尾流冲浪的大型船只会产生更大的波浪,这可能会对河流沿岸的财产和自然资源造成损害。如果没有公民的参与,这项研究中使用的过程和程序是不可能的。参与研究的市民允许他们的财产被用作严格监控的地点或自我监控的地点。自我监测的站点是收集更多数据的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Wave Energy on the Willamette River
The trend of using larger boats for wake surfing in river systems has caused concern for dock stability, bank erosion, safety of other boaters, and natural resource conservation. This study evaluates the wave energy due to boat traffic in the Newberg Pool of the Willamette River using budget conscious equipment and involving community stakeholders. Low-cost motion activated game cameras were used to record videos of waves when boats passed. The video processing was completed using image analysis in the computational tool Matlab. For each image a high-contrast point of reference was used for the tracking, often tape on a dock piling. As the wave or dock moved, the reference point in the image was tracked in Matlab using the maximum or minimum grayscale pixel in a specific part of the image. This calculation allowed the research team to approximate the change in vertical direction in pixels. A computational analysis tool was used at 4 sites, 2 in wake surfing zones, 1 in a wake zone, and 1 in a no wake zone, to quantify wave height and period. A total of 8567 videos were collected from the four sites, and 1227 were analyzed. For the wake surfing zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.026 m and 0.149 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 0.905 W/m and 19.2 W/m, respectively. In the wake zone, the average and maximum wave heights were 0.031 m and 0.137 m, respectively, and average and maximum wave energies were 1.405 W/m and 5.74 W/m, respectively. The average wave energy was higher in the wake zone, however, the maximum wave height and the number of boat-caused waves recorded were higher (2984 in the wake surfing zone compared to 1117 in the wake zone) in the wake surfing zone. Cameras were attached to dock pilings which may have resulted in lower values due to the dampening of the dock. Wake surfing was also observed in wake zones, where it is not allowed. This study indicates that the large boats used for wake surfing create larger waves that can potentially cause damage to property along the river and natural resources. The processes and procedures used within this research would not have been possible without citizen involvement. The citizens partaking in the research allowed for their property to be used as a heavily monitored site or a self-monitored site. The self-monitored sites were a useful tool in collecting more data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信