白桦和蜜蜂巢提取物的生物活性含量、BSLT毒性及抗氧化剂研究

Reinny Silvana Tuegeh, H. Sumampouw, M. N. Tanor, Y. Mokosuli
{"title":"白桦和蜜蜂巢提取物的生物活性含量、BSLT毒性及抗氧化剂研究","authors":"Reinny Silvana Tuegeh, H. Sumampouw, M. N. Tanor, Y. Mokosuli","doi":"10.36987/jpbn.v9i2.4514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beenest is rich in secondary metabolites because honeycombs, among others, are formed from plant resins (propolis). This study aimed to analyze differences in flavonoid content and in vitro antioxidant activity of Apis dorsata Binghami and Apis mellifera nest extracts. The samples used were A. dorsata from North Sulawesi and A. mellifera from South Sulawesi. The honeycomb was extracted using 95% ethanol solvent. Honeycomb extract was analyzed for its flavonoid content by the HPLC method, toxicity was tested by the BSLT method, and in vitro antioxidant activity was tested by the DPPH method. The results of the analysis of flavonoids showed that A. dorsata nest extract produced 21 types of compounds while A. mellifera produced 26 types of compounds. The toxicity test results showed that the A. dorsata nest extract had a better LC50 of 245,691 mg/l than the A. mellifera nest extract with an LC50 of 443,701 mg/l. The in vitro antioxidant test results of A. dorsata nest extract were more robust, namely IC 50 1.161 mg/l, compared to A. mellifera nest extract IC 50 2.404 mg/l. However, both were included in the category of powerful antioxidants. In vitro, anticancer test results on MCF-7 cells, A. mellifera nest extract was active with IC 50 100.02mg/l. Compared to A. dorsata extract, it was active with IC 50 102.217mg/l, but the two were not significantly different. Based on the analysis of flavonoid content, toxicity test, and antioxidant test, A.dorsata and A.mellifera honeycomb extracts have potential as in vitro antioxidants","PeriodicalId":422054,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN BIOLOGI NUKLEUS","volume":"7 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioactive Contents, BSLT Toxicity and antioxidants from Apis dorsata Binghami and Apis mellifera nest extracts\",\"authors\":\"Reinny Silvana Tuegeh, H. Sumampouw, M. N. Tanor, Y. Mokosuli\",\"doi\":\"10.36987/jpbn.v9i2.4514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beenest is rich in secondary metabolites because honeycombs, among others, are formed from plant resins (propolis). This study aimed to analyze differences in flavonoid content and in vitro antioxidant activity of Apis dorsata Binghami and Apis mellifera nest extracts. The samples used were A. dorsata from North Sulawesi and A. mellifera from South Sulawesi. The honeycomb was extracted using 95% ethanol solvent. Honeycomb extract was analyzed for its flavonoid content by the HPLC method, toxicity was tested by the BSLT method, and in vitro antioxidant activity was tested by the DPPH method. The results of the analysis of flavonoids showed that A. dorsata nest extract produced 21 types of compounds while A. mellifera produced 26 types of compounds. The toxicity test results showed that the A. dorsata nest extract had a better LC50 of 245,691 mg/l than the A. mellifera nest extract with an LC50 of 443,701 mg/l. The in vitro antioxidant test results of A. dorsata nest extract were more robust, namely IC 50 1.161 mg/l, compared to A. mellifera nest extract IC 50 2.404 mg/l. However, both were included in the category of powerful antioxidants. In vitro, anticancer test results on MCF-7 cells, A. mellifera nest extract was active with IC 50 100.02mg/l. Compared to A. dorsata extract, it was active with IC 50 102.217mg/l, but the two were not significantly different. Based on the analysis of flavonoid content, toxicity test, and antioxidant test, A.dorsata and A.mellifera honeycomb extracts have potential as in vitro antioxidants\",\"PeriodicalId\":422054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN BIOLOGI NUKLEUS\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN BIOLOGI NUKLEUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v9i2.4514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN BIOLOGI NUKLEUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v9i2.4514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Beenest富含次级代谢物,因为蜂巢和其他东西都是由植物树脂(蜂胶)形成的。本研究旨在分析白桦和蜜蜂巢提取物的类黄酮含量和体外抗氧化活性的差异。使用的样本为北苏拉威西岛的A. dorsata和南苏拉威西岛的A. mellifera。采用95%乙醇溶剂提取蜂窝状物质。采用高效液相色谱法测定蜂窝状提取物的黄酮含量,BSLT法测定其毒性,DPPH法测定蜂窝状提取物的体外抗氧化活性。黄酮类化合物分析结果表明,家蚕巢提取物产生21种化合物,蜜蜂巢提取物产生26种化合物。毒力试验结果表明,蜜蜂巢提取物的LC50为245,691 mg/l,优于蜜蜂巢提取物的LC50为443,701 mg/l。巢提取物的体外抗氧化效果较好,ic50为1.161 mg/l,而蜜蜂巢提取物的ic50为2.404 mg/l。然而,两者都属于强效抗氧化剂的范畴。体外对MCF-7细胞的抗癌实验结果表明,蜂窝提取物在IC 50 - 100.02mg/l时具有活性。与苦参提取物相比,其活性浓度为ic50 102.217mg/l,但两者差异不显著。通过黄酮类化合物含量分析、毒性试验和抗氧化试验,证实了蜂窝蜂和蜜蜂蜂窝蜂提取物具有体外抗氧化潜力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioactive Contents, BSLT Toxicity and antioxidants from Apis dorsata Binghami and Apis mellifera nest extracts
Beenest is rich in secondary metabolites because honeycombs, among others, are formed from plant resins (propolis). This study aimed to analyze differences in flavonoid content and in vitro antioxidant activity of Apis dorsata Binghami and Apis mellifera nest extracts. The samples used were A. dorsata from North Sulawesi and A. mellifera from South Sulawesi. The honeycomb was extracted using 95% ethanol solvent. Honeycomb extract was analyzed for its flavonoid content by the HPLC method, toxicity was tested by the BSLT method, and in vitro antioxidant activity was tested by the DPPH method. The results of the analysis of flavonoids showed that A. dorsata nest extract produced 21 types of compounds while A. mellifera produced 26 types of compounds. The toxicity test results showed that the A. dorsata nest extract had a better LC50 of 245,691 mg/l than the A. mellifera nest extract with an LC50 of 443,701 mg/l. The in vitro antioxidant test results of A. dorsata nest extract were more robust, namely IC 50 1.161 mg/l, compared to A. mellifera nest extract IC 50 2.404 mg/l. However, both were included in the category of powerful antioxidants. In vitro, anticancer test results on MCF-7 cells, A. mellifera nest extract was active with IC 50 100.02mg/l. Compared to A. dorsata extract, it was active with IC 50 102.217mg/l, but the two were not significantly different. Based on the analysis of flavonoid content, toxicity test, and antioxidant test, A.dorsata and A.mellifera honeycomb extracts have potential as in vitro antioxidants
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信