应用Robson十组分类系统分析设拉子医科大学附属医院剖宫产原因的横断面研究

M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi
{"title":"应用Robson十组分类系统分析设拉子医科大学附属医院剖宫产原因的横断面研究","authors":"M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nRobson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.\nThis study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.\n\n\n\nA cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The\ndata collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed\nthrough interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery\nconcepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and\nnumber of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.\n\n\n\nOf the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The\nmost common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]\nhad fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes\n\n\n\nThe biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed\nmultipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are\nstill increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404820666230427115622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nRobson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.\\nThis study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.\\n\\n\\n\\nA cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The\\ndata collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed\\nthrough interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery\\nconcepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and\\nnumber of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.\\n\\n\\n\\nOf the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The\\nmost common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]\\nhad fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes\\n\\n\\n\\nThe biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed\\nmultipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are\\nstill increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230427115622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

罗布森十组分类系统(RTGCS)被广泛用于评估、监测和比较分娩服务中心内部和之间的剖宫产率。本研究旨在探讨设拉子教学医院使用RTGCS治疗CD的原因。采用方便抽样的方法,选取伊朗设拉子地区某教学医院3个月内1787例孕妇行乳糜泻横断面研究。数据收集工具是通过访谈和医疗记录完成的人口统计、助产和生育信息问卷。根据RTGCS中描述的助产概念和参数对受试者进行分类。罗布森的10组分类是基于简单的产科参数[胎次,既往CS,胎龄,分娩开始,胎儿呈现,胎儿数量]。采用SPSS软件对数据进行分析,采用描述性检验对数据进行描述。1787例受试者中,455例(25.5%)为计划CS, 1332例(74.5%)为紧急CS。乳糜泻最常见的病因是既往乳糜泻(58.6%)和胎儿窘迫(27.6%)。总的来说,胎儿和胎盘原因有823(46.1%),1268名(71%)子宫原因,和78年(4.4%)孕产妇causesThe CD率最大的因素扮演了一个角色在当前研究termedmultipara女性历史的先前的CD。CD率和这个群体的总体规模已增加,因此,女性历史的前一个CD必须更有效的动机有阴道分娩后剖腹产(VBAC)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study
Robson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers. This study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS. A cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The data collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed through interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery concepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and number of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data. Of the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The most common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%] had fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes The biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed multipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are still increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信