M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi
{"title":"应用Robson十组分类系统分析设拉子医科大学附属医院剖宫产原因的横断面研究","authors":"M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi","doi":"10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nRobson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.\nThis study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.\n\n\n\nA cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The\ndata collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed\nthrough interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery\nconcepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and\nnumber of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.\n\n\n\nOf the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The\nmost common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]\nhad fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes\n\n\n\nThe biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed\nmultipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are\nstill increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"M. Akbarzadeh, Zohreh Rookesh, M. Zarshenas, N. Tayebi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404820666230427115622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nRobson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.\\nThis study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.\\n\\n\\n\\nA cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The\\ndata collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed\\nthrough interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery\\nconcepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and\\nnumber of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.\\n\\n\\n\\nOf the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The\\nmost common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]\\nhad fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes\\n\\n\\n\\nThe biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed\\nmultipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are\\nstill increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230427115622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230427115622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of cesarean section causes using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System in selected hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences: a cross-sectional study
Robson’s Ten Group Classification System [RTGCS] is widely used to evaluate, monitor, and compare cesarean delivery [CD] rates within and between delivery service centers.
This study aimed to investigate the causes of CD in Shiraz teaching hospitals using RTGCS.
A cross-sectional study on 1787 pregnant women who underwent CD in selected teaching hospitals in Shiraz, Iran, was selected via convenience sampling within 3 months. The
data collection tool was a demographic, midwifery, and fertility information questionnaire completed
through interviews and medical records. Subjects’ classification was performed based on midwifery
concepts and parameters described in RTGCS. The Robson's 10-group classification is based on simple obstetrical parameters [parity, previous CS, gestational age, onset of labour, fetal presentation, and
number of fetuses]. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive tests were used to describe the data.
Of the 1787 subjects, 455 [25.5%] had planned CS and 1332 [74.5%] had emergency CS. The
most common causes of CD were previous CD [58.6%] and fetal distress [27.6%]. Overall, 823 [46.1%]
had fetal and placental causes, 1268 [71%] had uterine causes, and 78 [4.4%] had maternal causes
The biggest factors that played a role in the CD rate in the present study were termed
multipara women with a history of previous CD. The CD rate and the overall size of this group are
still increasing, and as a result, women with a history of a previous CD must be motivated more effectively to have a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [VBAC]