涉及双边合约套期保值的电力现货市场模拟

G. Knežević, S. Nikolovski, P. Maric
{"title":"涉及双边合约套期保值的电力现货市场模拟","authors":"G. Knežević, S. Nikolovski, P. Maric","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2011.5952994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional electric companies operated as a regulated monopoly are separated in those for generation (GenCo), transmission (TransCo) and distribution (DisCo). Demand companies (DemCo), ISO (Independent system operator), and regulator are new companies which enable function of restructured electricity market. Regarding the time dimension, wholesale electricity markets are divided into the two groups: spot market and bilateral electricity market. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange electric power under a set of the specified conditions such as MW amount, time of delivery, duration, and price. Forward contract price predictability is the great advantage to spot price volatility, contracted parties are in that way hedged against such a risk, but the forward contracted price may be disadvantageous compared to the spot price. Generator and load can conclude a mutually beneficial and risk tolerable forward contract. In order to investigate GenCo strategies and possible benefit of bilateral agreement for two agents, model of electricity market with 6 GenCos and 5 DemCos is made in EMCAS. Three scenarios are simulated: first one is the base case where all GenCos are applying production cost strategy; in second case one GenCo is applying price-probing strategy; third scenario is case where bilateral forward agreement is conclude between one GenCo and one DemCo. Comparisons of the results are presented.","PeriodicalId":143375,"journal":{"name":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electricity spot market simulation involving bilateral contracts hedging\",\"authors\":\"G. Knežević, S. Nikolovski, P. Maric\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2011.5952994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional electric companies operated as a regulated monopoly are separated in those for generation (GenCo), transmission (TransCo) and distribution (DisCo). Demand companies (DemCo), ISO (Independent system operator), and regulator are new companies which enable function of restructured electricity market. Regarding the time dimension, wholesale electricity markets are divided into the two groups: spot market and bilateral electricity market. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange electric power under a set of the specified conditions such as MW amount, time of delivery, duration, and price. Forward contract price predictability is the great advantage to spot price volatility, contracted parties are in that way hedged against such a risk, but the forward contracted price may be disadvantageous compared to the spot price. Generator and load can conclude a mutually beneficial and risk tolerable forward contract. In order to investigate GenCo strategies and possible benefit of bilateral agreement for two agents, model of electricity market with 6 GenCos and 5 DemCos is made in EMCAS. Three scenarios are simulated: first one is the base case where all GenCos are applying production cost strategy; in second case one GenCo is applying price-probing strategy; third scenario is case where bilateral forward agreement is conclude between one GenCo and one DemCo. Comparisons of the results are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5952994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 8th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2011.5952994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

作为受监管的垄断企业,传统的电力公司分为发电(GenCo)、输电(TransCo)和配电(DisCo)。需求公司(DemCo)、独立系统运营商(ISO)和监管机构是实现电力市场重组功能的新公司。在时间维度上,将批发电力市场分为现货市场和双边电力市场。双边合同是双方在一定的兆瓦数、交付时间、期限、价格等条件下交换电力的协议。远期合约价格的可预测性是现货价格波动的巨大优势,合约各方以这种方式对冲了这种风险,但与现货价格相比,远期合约价格可能是不利的。发电机和负荷可以签订互惠互利、风险可承受的远期合同。为了研究发电公司的策略和两家代理商双边协议可能带来的利益,在EMCAS中建立了6个发电公司和5个电力公司的电力市场模型。本文模拟了三种情况:第一种情况是所有发电公司都采用生产成本策略的基本情况;在第二种情况下,一家发电公司采用价格调查策略;第三种情况是一个GenCo和一个DemCo之间达成双边远期协议。并对结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electricity spot market simulation involving bilateral contracts hedging
The traditional electric companies operated as a regulated monopoly are separated in those for generation (GenCo), transmission (TransCo) and distribution (DisCo). Demand companies (DemCo), ISO (Independent system operator), and regulator are new companies which enable function of restructured electricity market. Regarding the time dimension, wholesale electricity markets are divided into the two groups: spot market and bilateral electricity market. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties to exchange electric power under a set of the specified conditions such as MW amount, time of delivery, duration, and price. Forward contract price predictability is the great advantage to spot price volatility, contracted parties are in that way hedged against such a risk, but the forward contracted price may be disadvantageous compared to the spot price. Generator and load can conclude a mutually beneficial and risk tolerable forward contract. In order to investigate GenCo strategies and possible benefit of bilateral agreement for two agents, model of electricity market with 6 GenCos and 5 DemCos is made in EMCAS. Three scenarios are simulated: first one is the base case where all GenCos are applying production cost strategy; in second case one GenCo is applying price-probing strategy; third scenario is case where bilateral forward agreement is conclude between one GenCo and one DemCo. Comparisons of the results are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信