紧缩与激进喜剧的兴起

J. Brassett
{"title":"紧缩与激进喜剧的兴起","authors":"J. Brassett","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1c9hmqr.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter picks up previous strands from the ‘new satire’ to argue that the global financial crisis and the rise of austerity politics provided fertile ground for the return of ‘radical comedy’. Here the work of Russell Brand and Stewart Lee is discussed in terms of its ability to question and subvert the dominant mode of market agency: the neoliberal subject. For Brand, this is an opportunity to engage in wider themes of radical democracy, whereas Lee provides a more nuanced deconstruction of our place in global capital/ media flows.","PeriodicalId":261616,"journal":{"name":"The Ironic State","volume":"76 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Austerity and the Rise of Radical Comedy\",\"authors\":\"J. Brassett\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1c9hmqr.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter picks up previous strands from the ‘new satire’ to argue that the global financial crisis and the rise of austerity politics provided fertile ground for the return of ‘radical comedy’. Here the work of Russell Brand and Stewart Lee is discussed in terms of its ability to question and subvert the dominant mode of market agency: the neoliberal subject. For Brand, this is an opportunity to engage in wider themes of radical democracy, whereas Lee provides a more nuanced deconstruction of our place in global capital/ media flows.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Ironic State\",\"volume\":\"76 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Ironic State\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c9hmqr.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ironic State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c9hmqr.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章从“新讽刺”中选取先前的线索,认为全球金融危机和紧缩政治的兴起为“激进喜剧”的回归提供了肥沃的土壤。本文讨论了罗素·布兰德和斯图尔特·李的工作,讨论了他们质疑和颠覆市场主体的主导模式的能力:新自由主义主体。对于布兰德来说,这是一个参与激进民主的更广泛主题的机会,而李则对我们在全球资本/媒体流动中的位置进行了更细致的解构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Austerity and the Rise of Radical Comedy
This chapter picks up previous strands from the ‘new satire’ to argue that the global financial crisis and the rise of austerity politics provided fertile ground for the return of ‘radical comedy’. Here the work of Russell Brand and Stewart Lee is discussed in terms of its ability to question and subvert the dominant mode of market agency: the neoliberal subject. For Brand, this is an opportunity to engage in wider themes of radical democracy, whereas Lee provides a more nuanced deconstruction of our place in global capital/ media flows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信