赫纳特·霍特克维奇新闻学中的地缘政治和民族思想问题(为《两个酋长》一书提供材料)

О. Lavryk
{"title":"赫纳特·霍特克维奇新闻学中的地缘政治和民族思想问题(为《两个酋长》一书提供材料)","authors":"О. Lavryk","doi":"10.18524/2308-3255.2021.27.251415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to outline the issues of geopolitics and the national idea in the journalistic dilogy of H. Khotkevich «Two hetmans». It is proved that the images of Bohdan Khmelnitsky and Ivan Mazepa interested the author, first of all, as carriers of a certain amount of individual psychological and individual national traits.\n\nKhotkevich saw the failures of the Ukrainian state in the absence of an internal core (stable mono-ethnic consciousness) in Ukrainians, which led to the emergence of an inferiority complex and left a fatal imprint on the fateful actions of not only B. Khmelnytsky and I. Mazepa, but also many of their successors.\n\nIt was precisely in the absence of national stability that H. Khotkevich saw the main reason for the internal contradictions of Ukrainians, the lack of realization of their national idea, the stateless existence of the Ukrainian people.\nA characteristic feature of the dilogy was H. Khotkevych’s attempt to trace the inner path of the main characters to their awareness of geopolitics and the national idea as a guarantee of the Ukrainian nation and its desire to move to the highest stage of its development.\n\nKhotkevych first described the history of his people and the process of formation of the Ukrainian national character through relations with historically and culturally closest neighbors — Poles and Russians — as a deep psychological drama.\n\nThe concept that, according to the author’s conviction, was supposed to form a space for the national movement of the early 20th century: Ukraine is capable of independent historical development without outside support, has become a cross-cutting concept in H. Khotkevich’s worldview journalism.","PeriodicalId":444448,"journal":{"name":"Dialog: media studios","volume":"35 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questions of geopolitics and national ideas in the journalism of Hnat Khotkevich (for the materials of the dilogy «Two hetmans»)\",\"authors\":\"О. Lavryk\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2308-3255.2021.27.251415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article attempts to outline the issues of geopolitics and the national idea in the journalistic dilogy of H. Khotkevich «Two hetmans». It is proved that the images of Bohdan Khmelnitsky and Ivan Mazepa interested the author, first of all, as carriers of a certain amount of individual psychological and individual national traits.\\n\\nKhotkevich saw the failures of the Ukrainian state in the absence of an internal core (stable mono-ethnic consciousness) in Ukrainians, which led to the emergence of an inferiority complex and left a fatal imprint on the fateful actions of not only B. Khmelnytsky and I. Mazepa, but also many of their successors.\\n\\nIt was precisely in the absence of national stability that H. Khotkevich saw the main reason for the internal contradictions of Ukrainians, the lack of realization of their national idea, the stateless existence of the Ukrainian people.\\nA characteristic feature of the dilogy was H. Khotkevych’s attempt to trace the inner path of the main characters to their awareness of geopolitics and the national idea as a guarantee of the Ukrainian nation and its desire to move to the highest stage of its development.\\n\\nKhotkevych first described the history of his people and the process of formation of the Ukrainian national character through relations with historically and culturally closest neighbors — Poles and Russians — as a deep psychological drama.\\n\\nThe concept that, according to the author’s conviction, was supposed to form a space for the national movement of the early 20th century: Ukraine is capable of independent historical development without outside support, has become a cross-cutting concept in H. Khotkevich’s worldview journalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":444448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialog: media studios\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialog: media studios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2308-3255.2021.27.251415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialog: media studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2308-3255.2021.27.251415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图概述霍特克维奇《两个酋长》新闻学中的地缘政治问题和国家观念。事实证明,赫梅利尼茨基和马泽帕的形象之所以引起笔者的兴趣,首先是因为他们是某种个体心理和个体民族特质的载体。霍特克维奇认为,乌克兰国家的失败在于乌克兰人缺乏一个内部核心(稳定的单一民族意识),这导致了一种自卑情结的出现,不仅给赫梅利尼茨基和马泽帕(I. Mazepa),也给他们的许多继任者的命运行为留下了致命的印记。正是在缺乏国家稳定的情况下,H. Khotkevich看到了乌克兰人内部矛盾的主要原因,他们的国家理念没有实现,乌克兰人民的无国籍存在。霍特科维奇试图追溯主要人物的内心路径,以了解他们对地缘政治的意识和作为乌克兰民族保障的民族观念,以及乌克兰民族走向最高发展阶段的愿望。霍特科维奇首先描述了他的人民的历史和乌克兰民族性格的形成过程,通过与历史和文化上最亲密的邻国-波兰人和俄罗斯人-的关系,作为一个深刻的心理戏剧。乌克兰能够在没有外界支持的情况下进行独立的历史发展,这个在笔者看来应该为20世纪初的民族运动形成空间的概念,在霍特克维奇的世界观新闻学中已经成为一个跨领域的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questions of geopolitics and national ideas in the journalism of Hnat Khotkevich (for the materials of the dilogy «Two hetmans»)
The article attempts to outline the issues of geopolitics and the national idea in the journalistic dilogy of H. Khotkevich «Two hetmans». It is proved that the images of Bohdan Khmelnitsky and Ivan Mazepa interested the author, first of all, as carriers of a certain amount of individual psychological and individual national traits. Khotkevich saw the failures of the Ukrainian state in the absence of an internal core (stable mono-ethnic consciousness) in Ukrainians, which led to the emergence of an inferiority complex and left a fatal imprint on the fateful actions of not only B. Khmelnytsky and I. Mazepa, but also many of their successors. It was precisely in the absence of national stability that H. Khotkevich saw the main reason for the internal contradictions of Ukrainians, the lack of realization of their national idea, the stateless existence of the Ukrainian people. A characteristic feature of the dilogy was H. Khotkevych’s attempt to trace the inner path of the main characters to their awareness of geopolitics and the national idea as a guarantee of the Ukrainian nation and its desire to move to the highest stage of its development. Khotkevych first described the history of his people and the process of formation of the Ukrainian national character through relations with historically and culturally closest neighbors — Poles and Russians — as a deep psychological drama. The concept that, according to the author’s conviction, was supposed to form a space for the national movement of the early 20th century: Ukraine is capable of independent historical development without outside support, has become a cross-cutting concept in H. Khotkevich’s worldview journalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信