对达尔文的接受

D. Fergusson
{"title":"对达尔文的接受","authors":"D. Fergusson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198759348.003.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific consensus in favour of evolution generated some challenges for Scottish theology after the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859. Yet, despite some initial attempts to resist Darwinism on both scientific and scriptural grounds, theologians soon came to make their peace with evolutionary theory. Arguments for creation, providence, and human uniqueness were rehearsed alongside acknowledgement of gradual evolution, the descent of species from common origins, and extinction of earlier life forms. The design argument continued to be defended but in ways that suggested a sharper distinction between scientific and religious explanation. This is explored with reference to a body of literature that appeared for the most part in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The work of Rainy, Flint, Drummond, Calderwood, and Iverach is examined. In conclusion, the theological significance of evolutionary approaches to the study of religion itself is noted.","PeriodicalId":120315,"journal":{"name":"The History of Scottish Theology, Volume II","volume":"45 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reception of Darwin\",\"authors\":\"D. Fergusson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198759348.003.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scientific consensus in favour of evolution generated some challenges for Scottish theology after the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859. Yet, despite some initial attempts to resist Darwinism on both scientific and scriptural grounds, theologians soon came to make their peace with evolutionary theory. Arguments for creation, providence, and human uniqueness were rehearsed alongside acknowledgement of gradual evolution, the descent of species from common origins, and extinction of earlier life forms. The design argument continued to be defended but in ways that suggested a sharper distinction between scientific and religious explanation. This is explored with reference to a body of literature that appeared for the most part in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The work of Rainy, Flint, Drummond, Calderwood, and Iverach is examined. In conclusion, the theological significance of evolutionary approaches to the study of religion itself is noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The History of Scottish Theology, Volume II\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The History of Scottish Theology, Volume II\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759348.003.0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The History of Scottish Theology, Volume II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759348.003.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1859年《物种起源》出版后,支持进化论的科学共识给苏格兰神学带来了一些挑战。然而,尽管最初有人试图在科学和圣经的基础上抵制达尔文主义,神学家们很快就与进化论和解了。关于创造、天意和人类独特性的争论,与承认逐渐进化、物种从共同起源而来以及早期生命形式灭绝的观点同时出现。设计论继续得到辩护,但其方式表明,科学解释和宗教解释之间存在更明显的区别。这是通过参考19世纪最后25年出现的大量文献来探讨的。本文考察了雷尼、弗林特、德拉蒙德、卡尔德伍德和伊弗拉奇的作品。最后,指出了进化论方法对宗教本身研究的神学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Reception of Darwin
The scientific consensus in favour of evolution generated some challenges for Scottish theology after the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859. Yet, despite some initial attempts to resist Darwinism on both scientific and scriptural grounds, theologians soon came to make their peace with evolutionary theory. Arguments for creation, providence, and human uniqueness were rehearsed alongside acknowledgement of gradual evolution, the descent of species from common origins, and extinction of earlier life forms. The design argument continued to be defended but in ways that suggested a sharper distinction between scientific and religious explanation. This is explored with reference to a body of literature that appeared for the most part in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The work of Rainy, Flint, Drummond, Calderwood, and Iverach is examined. In conclusion, the theological significance of evolutionary approaches to the study of religion itself is noted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信