比较学生的错误解决问题分析很好

Yuliana Yuliana, Laila Dwi Pertiwi, Joko Sungkono
{"title":"比较学生的错误解决问题分析很好","authors":"Yuliana Yuliana, Laila Dwi Pertiwi, Joko Sungkono","doi":"10.23960/mtk/v10i3.pp275-289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of learning, not all students have good initial abilities. Most students need a better initial ability to participate in learning ratio problem-solving. On the other hand, if you have to prepare students to be ready to take part in learning mathematics, the teacher will experience difficulties, moreover, if the teacher has to give unequal treatment to every student before learning. Through a qualitative descriptive approach, this study aims to describe student errors in solving ratio problems in students with fairly good initial abilities. A total of 32 junior high school students in Klaten were research subjects and were given a preliminary ability test. According to the initial ability test that has been provided, it shows that more than 50% of students have a fairly good initial ability. All students with fairly good initial abilities were given a ratio problem-solving test. Based on the results of comparative problem-solving, two students were selected to be interviewed. From this analysis, it was concluded that students' errors in solving comparative problems include: understanding the problem (writing variables or problem information given), planning problem-solving (choosing problem-solving strategies, writing mileage formulas), and solving problems (substituting values into equations/formulas). , illustrating the problem into mathematical symbols), and reviewing problem-solving (writing conclusions, converting time measurement units).","PeriodicalId":440747,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung","volume":"16 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KESALAHAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH PERBANDINGAN PADA SISWA BERKEMAMPUAN AWAL CUKUP BAIK\",\"authors\":\"Yuliana Yuliana, Laila Dwi Pertiwi, Joko Sungkono\",\"doi\":\"10.23960/mtk/v10i3.pp275-289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the beginning of learning, not all students have good initial abilities. Most students need a better initial ability to participate in learning ratio problem-solving. On the other hand, if you have to prepare students to be ready to take part in learning mathematics, the teacher will experience difficulties, moreover, if the teacher has to give unequal treatment to every student before learning. Through a qualitative descriptive approach, this study aims to describe student errors in solving ratio problems in students with fairly good initial abilities. A total of 32 junior high school students in Klaten were research subjects and were given a preliminary ability test. According to the initial ability test that has been provided, it shows that more than 50% of students have a fairly good initial ability. All students with fairly good initial abilities were given a ratio problem-solving test. Based on the results of comparative problem-solving, two students were selected to be interviewed. From this analysis, it was concluded that students' errors in solving comparative problems include: understanding the problem (writing variables or problem information given), planning problem-solving (choosing problem-solving strategies, writing mileage formulas), and solving problems (substituting values into equations/formulas). , illustrating the problem into mathematical symbols), and reviewing problem-solving (writing conclusions, converting time measurement units).\",\"PeriodicalId\":440747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung\",\"volume\":\"16 14\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v10i3.pp275-289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v10i3.pp275-289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学习之初,并不是所有的学生都有良好的初始能力。大多数学生需要有较好的参与学习的初始能力来解决问题。另一方面,如果你必须让学生准备好参加学习数学,老师会遇到困难,而且,如果老师在学习之前必须给予每个学生不平等的待遇。本研究通过定性描述的方法,旨在描述具有较好初始能力的学生在解决比例问题时的错误。本研究以32名初中生为研究对象,对其进行了初步的能力测试。根据所提供的初始能力测试显示,超过50%的学生具有较好的初始能力。所有初步能力较好的学生都进行了比例问题解决测试。根据比较问题解决的结果,我们选择了两名学生进行访谈。通过分析,得出学生在解决比较问题时的错误包括:理解问题(写出给定的变量或问题信息)、计划问题(选择问题解决策略、写出里程公式)和解决问题(将值代入方程/公式)。(用数学符号说明问题),并回顾解决问题的方法(写结论,转换时间测量单位)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS KESALAHAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH PERBANDINGAN PADA SISWA BERKEMAMPUAN AWAL CUKUP BAIK
At the beginning of learning, not all students have good initial abilities. Most students need a better initial ability to participate in learning ratio problem-solving. On the other hand, if you have to prepare students to be ready to take part in learning mathematics, the teacher will experience difficulties, moreover, if the teacher has to give unequal treatment to every student before learning. Through a qualitative descriptive approach, this study aims to describe student errors in solving ratio problems in students with fairly good initial abilities. A total of 32 junior high school students in Klaten were research subjects and were given a preliminary ability test. According to the initial ability test that has been provided, it shows that more than 50% of students have a fairly good initial ability. All students with fairly good initial abilities were given a ratio problem-solving test. Based on the results of comparative problem-solving, two students were selected to be interviewed. From this analysis, it was concluded that students' errors in solving comparative problems include: understanding the problem (writing variables or problem information given), planning problem-solving (choosing problem-solving strategies, writing mileage formulas), and solving problems (substituting values into equations/formulas). , illustrating the problem into mathematical symbols), and reviewing problem-solving (writing conclusions, converting time measurement units).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信