Elizaveta Safonkina
{"title":"Роль бизнеса в региональном управлении на примере Делового консультативного совета (ДКС) АТЭС (The Role of Business in Regional Governance: The Case of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) in APEC)","authors":"Elizaveta Safonkina","doi":"10.17323/1996-7845-2016-03-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the modern globalized world, the international relations landscape is like a cake decorated with powder and other toppings. The international agenda is determined by the traditional actors - states (“flour, milk and other ingredients without which the cake could not be baked”) as set out in the theory of liberal intergovernmentalism. But a large number of non-governmental actors (“the decorative powder and toppings, but the cake is edible without them”) present their proposals and initiatives to the states, which states reflect on in their official documents. These proposals and initiatives tend to be mainly aligned with the states’ policies. This dialogue is important in making the international decision-making process legitimate, but does not mean that non-governmental actors are fully engaged in designing the international cooperation agenda. In this article the author tests this hypothesis through studying the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC).The author explores how the Asia-Pacific business priorities promoted by ABAC since its establishment in 1996 correspond with the key objectives and policies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum as well as ABAC’s internal and external communication model to access the ABAC actorness. The official ABAC and APEC documents constituted the evidence base for the analysis. Research methods include qualitative content and comparative historical analyses. The author concludes that ABAC has the characteristics of a formal actor in Asia-Pacific regional governance. It could therefore be considered a full-fledged partner in the APEC leaders’ documents although ABAC has no capacity to change the regional agenda. From an economic perspective, this phenomenon could be explained by the fact that the states and businesses in the region have common interests because states need business-led growth and business needs the robust competition that trade and investment liberalization can provide.","PeriodicalId":201864,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: Regional Governance eJournal","volume":"62 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: Regional Governance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2016-03-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球化的今天,国际关系就像一个蛋糕,上面点缀着各种各样的配料。按照自由政府间主义的理论,国际议程是由传统的行动者——国家(“没有面粉、牛奶和其他配料,蛋糕就烤不出来”)决定的。但大量的民间行动者(“装饰粉和配料,但蛋糕可以吃”)向各州提出了他们的建议和倡议,各州在官方文件中反映了这些建议和倡议。这些提议和倡议往往主要与各州的政策保持一致。这种对话对于使国际决策过程合法化是重要的,但并不意味着非政府行为体充分参与设计国际合作议程。本文通过对亚太经合组织工商咨询理事会(ABAC)的研究,验证了这一假设。作者探讨了ABAC自1996年成立以来推动的亚太商业优先事项如何与亚太经合组织(APEC)论坛的主要目标和政策以及ABAC的内部和外部沟通模式相对应,以获得ABAC的行动者。ABAC和APEC的官方文件构成了分析的证据基础。研究方法包括定性内容分析和比较历史分析。笔者认为,亚太经合组织在亚太地区治理中具有正式行动者的特征。因此,在APEC领导人的文件中,它可以被视为一个成熟的伙伴,尽管ABAC没有能力改变区域议程。从经济角度来看,这一现象可以用以下事实来解释:该地区的国家和企业具有共同利益,因为国家需要企业主导的增长,而企业需要贸易和投资自由化所能提供的强劲竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Роль бизнеса в региональном управлении на примере Делового консультативного совета (ДКС) АТЭС (The Role of Business in Regional Governance: The Case of the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) in APEC)
In the modern globalized world, the international relations landscape is like a cake decorated with powder and other toppings. The international agenda is determined by the traditional actors - states (“flour, milk and other ingredients without which the cake could not be baked”) as set out in the theory of liberal intergovernmentalism. But a large number of non-governmental actors (“the decorative powder and toppings, but the cake is edible without them”) present their proposals and initiatives to the states, which states reflect on in their official documents. These proposals and initiatives tend to be mainly aligned with the states’ policies. This dialogue is important in making the international decision-making process legitimate, but does not mean that non-governmental actors are fully engaged in designing the international cooperation agenda. In this article the author tests this hypothesis through studying the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC).The author explores how the Asia-Pacific business priorities promoted by ABAC since its establishment in 1996 correspond with the key objectives and policies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum as well as ABAC’s internal and external communication model to access the ABAC actorness. The official ABAC and APEC documents constituted the evidence base for the analysis. Research methods include qualitative content and comparative historical analyses. The author concludes that ABAC has the characteristics of a formal actor in Asia-Pacific regional governance. It could therefore be considered a full-fledged partner in the APEC leaders’ documents although ABAC has no capacity to change the regional agenda. From an economic perspective, this phenomenon could be explained by the fact that the states and businesses in the region have common interests because states need business-led growth and business needs the robust competition that trade and investment liberalization can provide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信