13-15岁新加坡华人肥胖与非肥胖男孩的静息代谢率

D. Stensel, F. Lin, A. Nevill
{"title":"13-15岁新加坡华人肥胖与非肥胖男孩的静息代谢率","authors":"D. Stensel, F. Lin, A. Nevill","doi":"10.1093/AJCN/74.3.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPrevious studies investigating the hypothesis that a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a cause of obesity yielded discrepant findings. Two explanations for these findings are the use of imprecise methods to determine obesity and a failure to control for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) when comparing RMR values.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThis study tested the hypothesis that RMR is lower in obese than in nonobese boys (with the use of precise methods to quantify body fatness and with adjustment for differences in both FM and FFM).\n\n\nDESIGN\nForty Chinese Singaporean boys aged 12.8-15.1 y were recruited. Boys were classified as obese (n = 20) or nonobese (n = 20) on the basis of their adiposity index (ratio of FM to FFM: >0.60 = obese, <0.40 = nonobese) determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RMR was determined by using indirect calorimetry. RMR values were compared by using both linear (analysis of covariance) and log-linear (analysis of covariance with log-transformed data) regression to control for differences in FM and FFM.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAge, height, and FFM did not differ significantly between groups. Body mass was 13 kg greater and FM was 16 kg greater in the obese boys than in the nonobese boys (P < 0.001). After control for FFM and FM, RMR did not differ significantly between the groups.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWhen body composition is appropriately controlled for, RMR does not differ significantly between obese and nonobese boys.","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resting metabolic rate in obese and nonobese Chinese Singaporean boys aged 13-15 y.\",\"authors\":\"D. Stensel, F. Lin, A. Nevill\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/AJCN/74.3.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPrevious studies investigating the hypothesis that a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a cause of obesity yielded discrepant findings. Two explanations for these findings are the use of imprecise methods to determine obesity and a failure to control for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) when comparing RMR values.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVE\\nThis study tested the hypothesis that RMR is lower in obese than in nonobese boys (with the use of precise methods to quantify body fatness and with adjustment for differences in both FM and FFM).\\n\\n\\nDESIGN\\nForty Chinese Singaporean boys aged 12.8-15.1 y were recruited. Boys were classified as obese (n = 20) or nonobese (n = 20) on the basis of their adiposity index (ratio of FM to FFM: >0.60 = obese, <0.40 = nonobese) determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RMR was determined by using indirect calorimetry. RMR values were compared by using both linear (analysis of covariance) and log-linear (analysis of covariance with log-transformed data) regression to control for differences in FM and FFM.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAge, height, and FFM did not differ significantly between groups. Body mass was 13 kg greater and FM was 16 kg greater in the obese boys than in the nonobese boys (P < 0.001). After control for FFM and FM, RMR did not differ significantly between the groups.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nWhen body composition is appropriately controlled for, RMR does not differ significantly between obese and nonobese boys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/74.3.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/74.3.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景先前的研究调查了低静息代谢率(RMR)是肥胖的一个原因的假设,得出了不同的结果。对这些发现的两种解释是使用不精确的方法来确定肥胖,以及在比较RMR值时未能控制脂肪质量(FM)和无脂肪质量(FFM)的差异。目的:本研究验证了肥胖男孩的RMR低于非肥胖男孩的假设(通过使用精确的方法来量化身体脂肪,并调整FM和FFM的差异)。设计招募40名年龄在12.8-15.1岁的新加坡华人男孩。根据双能x线吸收仪测定的肥胖指数(FM与FFM之比:>0.60 =肥胖,<0.40 =非肥胖)将男孩分为肥胖(n = 20)和非肥胖(n = 20)。用间接量热法测定RMR。采用线性(协方差分析)和对数线性(对数转换数据的协方差分析)回归比较RMR值,以控制FM和FFM的差异。结果两组患者年龄、身高、FFM差异无统计学意义。肥胖男孩的体重比非肥胖男孩高13 kg, FM比非肥胖男孩高16 kg (P < 0.001)。在对FFM和FM进行对照后,组间RMR无显著差异。结论在适当控制体成分的情况下,肥胖男孩和非肥胖男孩的RMR无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resting metabolic rate in obese and nonobese Chinese Singaporean boys aged 13-15 y.
BACKGROUND Previous studies investigating the hypothesis that a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is a cause of obesity yielded discrepant findings. Two explanations for these findings are the use of imprecise methods to determine obesity and a failure to control for differences in fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) when comparing RMR values. OBJECTIVE This study tested the hypothesis that RMR is lower in obese than in nonobese boys (with the use of precise methods to quantify body fatness and with adjustment for differences in both FM and FFM). DESIGN Forty Chinese Singaporean boys aged 12.8-15.1 y were recruited. Boys were classified as obese (n = 20) or nonobese (n = 20) on the basis of their adiposity index (ratio of FM to FFM: >0.60 = obese, <0.40 = nonobese) determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RMR was determined by using indirect calorimetry. RMR values were compared by using both linear (analysis of covariance) and log-linear (analysis of covariance with log-transformed data) regression to control for differences in FM and FFM. RESULTS Age, height, and FFM did not differ significantly between groups. Body mass was 13 kg greater and FM was 16 kg greater in the obese boys than in the nonobese boys (P < 0.001). After control for FFM and FM, RMR did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION When body composition is appropriately controlled for, RMR does not differ significantly between obese and nonobese boys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信