鲁棒回归的一些最新进展综述

R. Wilcox
{"title":"鲁棒回归的一些最新进展综述","authors":"R. Wilcox","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-8317.1996.TB01088.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In situations where the goal is to understand how a random variable y is related to a set of p predictor variables, modern robust regression methods can be invaluable. One reason is that even one unusual value in the design space, or one outlier among the y values, can have a large impact on the ordinary least squares estimate of the parameters of the usual linear model. That is, a single unusual value or outlier can give a highly distorted view of how two or more random variables are related. Another reason is that modern robust methods can be much more efficient than ordinary least squares yet maintain good efficiency under the ideal conditions of normality and a homoscedastic error term. Even when sampling is from light-tailed distributions, there are situations where certain robust methods are highly efficient compared to least squares, as is indicated in this paper. Most applied researchers in psychology simply ignore these problems. In the hope of improving current practice, this paper reviews some of the robust methods currently available with an emphasis on recent developments. Of particular interest are methods for computing confidence intervals and dealing with heteroscedasticity in the error term.","PeriodicalId":229922,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of some recent developments in robust regression\",\"authors\":\"R. Wilcox\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.2044-8317.1996.TB01088.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In situations where the goal is to understand how a random variable y is related to a set of p predictor variables, modern robust regression methods can be invaluable. One reason is that even one unusual value in the design space, or one outlier among the y values, can have a large impact on the ordinary least squares estimate of the parameters of the usual linear model. That is, a single unusual value or outlier can give a highly distorted view of how two or more random variables are related. Another reason is that modern robust methods can be much more efficient than ordinary least squares yet maintain good efficiency under the ideal conditions of normality and a homoscedastic error term. Even when sampling is from light-tailed distributions, there are situations where certain robust methods are highly efficient compared to least squares, as is indicated in this paper. Most applied researchers in psychology simply ignore these problems. In the hope of improving current practice, this paper reviews some of the robust methods currently available with an emphasis on recent developments. Of particular interest are methods for computing confidence intervals and dealing with heteroscedasticity in the error term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8317.1996.TB01088.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8317.1996.TB01088.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

在目标是理解随机变量y如何与一组p预测变量相关的情况下,现代鲁棒回归方法可能是无价之宝。一个原因是,即使是设计空间中的一个不寻常值,或者y值中的一个异常值,也会对通常线性模型参数的普通最小二乘估计产生很大影响。也就是说,一个不寻常的值或离群值可以给出一个高度扭曲的观点,说明两个或多个随机变量是如何相关的。另一个原因是,现代鲁棒方法可以比普通最小二乘更有效,但在正态性和均方差误差项的理想条件下保持良好的效率。即使抽样来自轻尾分布,在某些情况下,与最小二乘相比,某些鲁棒方法效率很高,如本文所示。大多数心理学的应用研究者都忽略了这些问题。为了改进目前的实践,本文回顾了一些目前可用的鲁棒方法,重点介绍了最近的发展。特别令人感兴趣的是计算置信区间和处理误差项的异方差的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of some recent developments in robust regression
In situations where the goal is to understand how a random variable y is related to a set of p predictor variables, modern robust regression methods can be invaluable. One reason is that even one unusual value in the design space, or one outlier among the y values, can have a large impact on the ordinary least squares estimate of the parameters of the usual linear model. That is, a single unusual value or outlier can give a highly distorted view of how two or more random variables are related. Another reason is that modern robust methods can be much more efficient than ordinary least squares yet maintain good efficiency under the ideal conditions of normality and a homoscedastic error term. Even when sampling is from light-tailed distributions, there are situations where certain robust methods are highly efficient compared to least squares, as is indicated in this paper. Most applied researchers in psychology simply ignore these problems. In the hope of improving current practice, this paper reviews some of the robust methods currently available with an emphasis on recent developments. Of particular interest are methods for computing confidence intervals and dealing with heteroscedasticity in the error term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信