{"title":"相关系数来自2 × 2表和双列数据","authors":"R. Chambers","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-8317.1982.TB00654.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various measures of correlation between two quantities x and y are discussed, and it is shown that the phi coefficient is a logically unacceptable measure except perhaps when both x and y are purely qualitative two-valued attributes. \n \n \n \nFor biserial data, a new measure of correlation is proposed which is free from the shortcomings of the biserial coefficient and the point biserial coefficient.","PeriodicalId":229922,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation coefficients from 2 × 2 tables and from biserial data\",\"authors\":\"R. Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.2044-8317.1982.TB00654.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various measures of correlation between two quantities x and y are discussed, and it is shown that the phi coefficient is a logically unacceptable measure except perhaps when both x and y are purely qualitative two-valued attributes. \\n \\n \\n \\nFor biserial data, a new measure of correlation is proposed which is free from the shortcomings of the biserial coefficient and the point biserial coefficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8317.1982.TB00654.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8317.1982.TB00654.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation coefficients from 2 × 2 tables and from biserial data
Various measures of correlation between two quantities x and y are discussed, and it is shown that the phi coefficient is a logically unacceptable measure except perhaps when both x and y are purely qualitative two-valued attributes.
For biserial data, a new measure of correlation is proposed which is free from the shortcomings of the biserial coefficient and the point biserial coefficient.