用于短期血液透析的体外和曲伏酚线圈的比较:一份消费者报告。

E Crichton, J James, S Hogle, H Husdan, R Ogilvie, E Porrett, P R Uldall
{"title":"用于短期血液透析的体外和曲伏酚线圈的比较:一份消费者报告。","authors":"E Crichton,&nbsp;J James,&nbsp;S Hogle,&nbsp;H Husdan,&nbsp;R Ogilvie,&nbsp;E Porrett,&nbsp;P R Uldall","doi":"10.3109/08860227809103864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A cross-over study carried out over a 24 week period during 1975-76 was designed to test the relative merits of Extracorporeal versus Travenol coils for thrice weekly short periods of haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. Predictability of and capacity for ultrafiltration were excellent and equally good for both products. Leak rates in Travenol coils were 9.3% as compared to 4.3% for Extracorporeal coils. Dialysances of BUN, creatinine, and phosphate were significantly higher with Travenol coils than with Extracorporeal coils, but this increase was not as great as might be expected from the greater surface area of the Travenol coil. Despite the greater functional efficiency of the Travenol coils we could detect no difference in the degree of biochemical control of the patients as judged by standard pre and post dialysis blood chemistries. Residual blood volumes averaged 9 mls for the Travenol coils as compared to 1.6 mls for Extracorporeal coils.</p>","PeriodicalId":75998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dialysis","volume":"2 1","pages":"55-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08860227809103864","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison for extracorporeal and travenol coils for the conduct of short haemodialysis: a consumer report.\",\"authors\":\"E Crichton,&nbsp;J James,&nbsp;S Hogle,&nbsp;H Husdan,&nbsp;R Ogilvie,&nbsp;E Porrett,&nbsp;P R Uldall\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/08860227809103864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A cross-over study carried out over a 24 week period during 1975-76 was designed to test the relative merits of Extracorporeal versus Travenol coils for thrice weekly short periods of haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. Predictability of and capacity for ultrafiltration were excellent and equally good for both products. Leak rates in Travenol coils were 9.3% as compared to 4.3% for Extracorporeal coils. Dialysances of BUN, creatinine, and phosphate were significantly higher with Travenol coils than with Extracorporeal coils, but this increase was not as great as might be expected from the greater surface area of the Travenol coil. Despite the greater functional efficiency of the Travenol coils we could detect no difference in the degree of biochemical control of the patients as judged by standard pre and post dialysis blood chemistries. Residual blood volumes averaged 9 mls for the Travenol coils as compared to 1.6 mls for Extracorporeal coils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dialysis\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"55-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/08860227809103864\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/08860227809103864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/08860227809103864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1975- 1976年间进行了一项为期24周的交叉研究,旨在测试每周三次短期血液透析对终末期肾衰竭患者的体外和曲伏酚线圈的相对优点。两种产品的超滤可预测性和超滤能力都很好。曲伏酚线圈的泄漏率为9.3%,而体外线圈的泄漏率为4.3%。曲venol线圈的尿素氮、肌酐和磷酸盐透析度明显高于体外线圈,但这种增加并不像曲venol线圈更大的表面积所预期的那样大。尽管曲伏酚线圈的功能效率更高,但我们可以通过透析前后的标准血液化学来判断患者的生化控制程度没有差异。曲伏酚线圈的平均残余血容量为9毫升,而体外线圈的平均残余血容量为1.6毫升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison for extracorporeal and travenol coils for the conduct of short haemodialysis: a consumer report.

A cross-over study carried out over a 24 week period during 1975-76 was designed to test the relative merits of Extracorporeal versus Travenol coils for thrice weekly short periods of haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. Predictability of and capacity for ultrafiltration were excellent and equally good for both products. Leak rates in Travenol coils were 9.3% as compared to 4.3% for Extracorporeal coils. Dialysances of BUN, creatinine, and phosphate were significantly higher with Travenol coils than with Extracorporeal coils, but this increase was not as great as might be expected from the greater surface area of the Travenol coil. Despite the greater functional efficiency of the Travenol coils we could detect no difference in the degree of biochemical control of the patients as judged by standard pre and post dialysis blood chemistries. Residual blood volumes averaged 9 mls for the Travenol coils as compared to 1.6 mls for Extracorporeal coils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信