{"title":"失而复得:台湾日文文学的翻译问题","authors":"T. Lin","doi":"10.1515/9783110641998-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": A high percentage of colonial Taiwanese literary works during the late Taish ō period to the Sh ō wa period (1920 – 1946) was written in Japanese. To write in Japanese was not only a promising way to have works published in imperial Japan, but also provided a possible path for Taiwanese authors to reach a wider readership among Japanophone communities in East Asia. However, in the im-mediate post-war years, the body of Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ torn off ” from Taiwanese literary history in the name of “ decolonization. ” All publications in Japanese were abolished in Taiwan from 1946, and it was not until the lift-ing of the thirty-eight-year period of martial law that Japanophone Taiwanese literature was finally reintroduced to post-war Taiwanese generations in Chinese translation. This article will tackle the issues of how Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ translated back ” into Chinese in order to reflect “ authentic ” Taiwanese culture. The translations of the Taiwanese writer Nao Weng ’ s works will be used as examples, as his modernist literary representation is particularly worthy of scrutiny and highly challenging for translators to render “ faithfully. ”","PeriodicalId":101944,"journal":{"name":"Literary Translation, Reception, and Transfer","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lost and Found: Issues of Translating Japanophone Taiwanese Literature\",\"authors\":\"T. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110641998-029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": A high percentage of colonial Taiwanese literary works during the late Taish ō period to the Sh ō wa period (1920 – 1946) was written in Japanese. To write in Japanese was not only a promising way to have works published in imperial Japan, but also provided a possible path for Taiwanese authors to reach a wider readership among Japanophone communities in East Asia. However, in the im-mediate post-war years, the body of Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ torn off ” from Taiwanese literary history in the name of “ decolonization. ” All publications in Japanese were abolished in Taiwan from 1946, and it was not until the lift-ing of the thirty-eight-year period of martial law that Japanophone Taiwanese literature was finally reintroduced to post-war Taiwanese generations in Chinese translation. This article will tackle the issues of how Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ translated back ” into Chinese in order to reflect “ authentic ” Taiwanese culture. The translations of the Taiwanese writer Nao Weng ’ s works will be used as examples, as his modernist literary representation is particularly worthy of scrutiny and highly challenging for translators to render “ faithfully. ”\",\"PeriodicalId\":101944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literary Translation, Reception, and Transfer\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literary Translation, Reception, and Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641998-029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literary Translation, Reception, and Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641998-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lost and Found: Issues of Translating Japanophone Taiwanese Literature
: A high percentage of colonial Taiwanese literary works during the late Taish ō period to the Sh ō wa period (1920 – 1946) was written in Japanese. To write in Japanese was not only a promising way to have works published in imperial Japan, but also provided a possible path for Taiwanese authors to reach a wider readership among Japanophone communities in East Asia. However, in the im-mediate post-war years, the body of Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ torn off ” from Taiwanese literary history in the name of “ decolonization. ” All publications in Japanese were abolished in Taiwan from 1946, and it was not until the lift-ing of the thirty-eight-year period of martial law that Japanophone Taiwanese literature was finally reintroduced to post-war Taiwanese generations in Chinese translation. This article will tackle the issues of how Japanophone Taiwanese literature was “ translated back ” into Chinese in order to reflect “ authentic ” Taiwanese culture. The translations of the Taiwanese writer Nao Weng ’ s works will be used as examples, as his modernist literary representation is particularly worthy of scrutiny and highly challenging for translators to render “ faithfully. ”