M. Artal, G. Almeida, A. Caloto-Oliveira, Maria Alice Santos, G. Umbuzeiro, Cassiana Maria Reganhan Coneglian
{"title":"对一个灭活铀矿流出物的毒性评估:poos de Caldas(巴西)的例子","authors":"M. Artal, G. Almeida, A. Caloto-Oliveira, Maria Alice Santos, G. Umbuzeiro, Cassiana Maria Reganhan Coneglian","doi":"10.5132/EEC.2013.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uranium mines can cause environmental impact because of acid mine drainages can reaches the surrounding water bodies. In this work we tested effluent samples from an inactivated uranium mine located in Pocos de Caldas city (Minas Gerais, Brazil) for acute and chronic toxicity. Untreated effluents were acutely toxic to Daphnia similis, with EC50 (48 h) varying from <0.01% to 38%. Both treated and untreated effluent samples presented chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Vibrio fischeri acute toxicity tests were negative for all tested samples. Adjustment of pH performed in samples was not sufficient to remove acute toxicity indicating that not only pH was responsible for the observed effect. The physical-chemical treatment applied was not able to remove the chronic toxicity to C. dubia. V. fischeri, although a rapid test and easy to handle, was not sensitive to the level of toxicants present in the effluent from the mine. To determine the actual impact of the discharge of effluent into receiving waters, both the flow of the effluent and river should be considered. Nevertheless chronic toxicity tests with C. dubia could be included in the monitoring program of this facility to provide more information about the impact of this discharge.","PeriodicalId":163251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Ecotoxicology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toxicity assessment of an effluent derived from an inactivated uranium mine: the Poços de Caldas (Brazil) example\",\"authors\":\"M. Artal, G. Almeida, A. Caloto-Oliveira, Maria Alice Santos, G. Umbuzeiro, Cassiana Maria Reganhan Coneglian\",\"doi\":\"10.5132/EEC.2013.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uranium mines can cause environmental impact because of acid mine drainages can reaches the surrounding water bodies. In this work we tested effluent samples from an inactivated uranium mine located in Pocos de Caldas city (Minas Gerais, Brazil) for acute and chronic toxicity. Untreated effluents were acutely toxic to Daphnia similis, with EC50 (48 h) varying from <0.01% to 38%. Both treated and untreated effluent samples presented chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Vibrio fischeri acute toxicity tests were negative for all tested samples. Adjustment of pH performed in samples was not sufficient to remove acute toxicity indicating that not only pH was responsible for the observed effect. The physical-chemical treatment applied was not able to remove the chronic toxicity to C. dubia. V. fischeri, although a rapid test and easy to handle, was not sensitive to the level of toxicants present in the effluent from the mine. To determine the actual impact of the discharge of effluent into receiving waters, both the flow of the effluent and river should be considered. Nevertheless chronic toxicity tests with C. dubia could be included in the monitoring program of this facility to provide more information about the impact of this discharge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5132/EEC.2013.01.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Brazilian Society of Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5132/EEC.2013.01.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
铀矿对环境的影响主要是由于矿山的酸性废水会到达周边水体。在这项工作中,我们对位于Pocos de Caldas市(巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州)的一个灭活铀矿的污水样本进行了急性和慢性毒性测试。未经处理的废水对相似水蚤有急性毒性,EC50 (48 h)从<0.01%到38%不等。处理过的和未处理过的出水样品均对dubia Ceriodaphnia呈现慢性毒性。所有样本的费氏弧菌急性毒性试验均为阴性。在样品中进行的pH调整不足以消除急性毒性,这表明pH值不仅仅是观察到的效果的原因。物理化学处理不能消除对双歧杆菌的慢性毒性。费氏弧菌虽然是一种快速测试和易于处理的方法,但对矿井流出物中存在的有毒物质水平并不敏感。为了确定向接收水域排放污水的实际影响,应同时考虑污水和河流的流量。尽管如此,该设施的监测方案中可包括dubia的慢性毒性试验,以提供有关这种排放影响的更多信息。
Toxicity assessment of an effluent derived from an inactivated uranium mine: the Poços de Caldas (Brazil) example
Uranium mines can cause environmental impact because of acid mine drainages can reaches the surrounding water bodies. In this work we tested effluent samples from an inactivated uranium mine located in Pocos de Caldas city (Minas Gerais, Brazil) for acute and chronic toxicity. Untreated effluents were acutely toxic to Daphnia similis, with EC50 (48 h) varying from <0.01% to 38%. Both treated and untreated effluent samples presented chronic toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Vibrio fischeri acute toxicity tests were negative for all tested samples. Adjustment of pH performed in samples was not sufficient to remove acute toxicity indicating that not only pH was responsible for the observed effect. The physical-chemical treatment applied was not able to remove the chronic toxicity to C. dubia. V. fischeri, although a rapid test and easy to handle, was not sensitive to the level of toxicants present in the effluent from the mine. To determine the actual impact of the discharge of effluent into receiving waters, both the flow of the effluent and river should be considered. Nevertheless chronic toxicity tests with C. dubia could be included in the monitoring program of this facility to provide more information about the impact of this discharge.