印尼和越南专属经济区的冲突解决方案,保护纳图纳北部的海洋资源

Andri Yanto
{"title":"印尼和越南专属经济区的冲突解决方案,保护纳图纳北部的海洋资源","authors":"Andri Yanto","doi":"10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"North Natuna is one part of the territorial waters of Indonesia which is very rich in resources. According to the applicable jurisdiction based on Law Number 17 of 1985 concerning the 1982 UNCLOS Ratification, North Natuna which has been proven to have the largest natural gas reserves in the Asia Pacific, is an inseparable part of Indonesia's EEZ. However, the 1982 ratification of UNCLOS in another country, namely Vietnam, also provides a similar explanation, that geographically North Natuna is its territory. This difference in conception has resulted in many incidents, from confrontations between law enforcement officers from the two countries, the capture of Vietnamese fishermen and the sinking of ships by the Indonesian authorities, to the complexity of the negotiation process between the two countries. In the midst of these problems, the governments of the two countries must make quick efforts in the face of growing external pressure, namely China's Nine Dash Line claims, as well as the need to use North Natuna itself. Using a juridical-normative research pattern, this paper attempts to unravel the 1982 UNCLOS provisions in conflict resolution and their relevance to Indonesia's strategy in resolving the EEZ dispute case with Vietnam in North Natuna.","PeriodicalId":299989,"journal":{"name":"Recht Studiosum Law Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RESOLUSI KONFLIK ZONA EKONOMI EKSLUSIF INDONESIA DAN VIETNAM DALAM PENGAMANAN SUMBER DAYA MARITIM NATUNA UTARA\",\"authors\":\"Andri Yanto\",\"doi\":\"10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"North Natuna is one part of the territorial waters of Indonesia which is very rich in resources. According to the applicable jurisdiction based on Law Number 17 of 1985 concerning the 1982 UNCLOS Ratification, North Natuna which has been proven to have the largest natural gas reserves in the Asia Pacific, is an inseparable part of Indonesia's EEZ. However, the 1982 ratification of UNCLOS in another country, namely Vietnam, also provides a similar explanation, that geographically North Natuna is its territory. This difference in conception has resulted in many incidents, from confrontations between law enforcement officers from the two countries, the capture of Vietnamese fishermen and the sinking of ships by the Indonesian authorities, to the complexity of the negotiation process between the two countries. In the midst of these problems, the governments of the two countries must make quick efforts in the face of growing external pressure, namely China's Nine Dash Line claims, as well as the need to use North Natuna itself. Using a juridical-normative research pattern, this paper attempts to unravel the 1982 UNCLOS provisions in conflict resolution and their relevance to Indonesia's strategy in resolving the EEZ dispute case with Vietnam in North Natuna.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recht Studiosum Law Review\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recht Studiosum Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recht Studiosum Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i1.11279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

北纳土纳是印尼领海的一部分,资源非常丰富。根据1982年批准《联合国海洋法公约》的1985年第17号法律的适用管辖权,北纳土纳已被证实拥有亚太地区最大的天然气储量,是印尼专属经济区不可分割的一部分。然而,1982年另一个国家,即越南,批准了《联合国海洋法公约》,也提供了类似的解释,即北纳土纳在地理上是其领土。这种观念上的差异导致了许多事件,从两国执法人员之间的对抗、越南渔民被捕获和印度尼西亚当局击沉船只,到两国之间谈判进程的复杂性。在这些问题中,面对日益增长的外部压力,即中国的九段线主张,以及使用北纳土纳群岛本身的需要,两国政府必须迅速做出努力。本文采用司法规范研究模式,试图揭示1982年《联合国海洋法公约》在冲突解决方面的规定及其与印尼解决北纳土纳群岛与越南专属经济区争端案战略的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RESOLUSI KONFLIK ZONA EKONOMI EKSLUSIF INDONESIA DAN VIETNAM DALAM PENGAMANAN SUMBER DAYA MARITIM NATUNA UTARA
North Natuna is one part of the territorial waters of Indonesia which is very rich in resources. According to the applicable jurisdiction based on Law Number 17 of 1985 concerning the 1982 UNCLOS Ratification, North Natuna which has been proven to have the largest natural gas reserves in the Asia Pacific, is an inseparable part of Indonesia's EEZ. However, the 1982 ratification of UNCLOS in another country, namely Vietnam, also provides a similar explanation, that geographically North Natuna is its territory. This difference in conception has resulted in many incidents, from confrontations between law enforcement officers from the two countries, the capture of Vietnamese fishermen and the sinking of ships by the Indonesian authorities, to the complexity of the negotiation process between the two countries. In the midst of these problems, the governments of the two countries must make quick efforts in the face of growing external pressure, namely China's Nine Dash Line claims, as well as the need to use North Natuna itself. Using a juridical-normative research pattern, this paper attempts to unravel the 1982 UNCLOS provisions in conflict resolution and their relevance to Indonesia's strategy in resolving the EEZ dispute case with Vietnam in North Natuna.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信