家用电磁炉最佳运行e类逆变器中Si IGBT与SiC MOSFET的比较研究

Satit Mangkalajarn, C. Ekkaravarodome, Surat Sukanna, A. Bilsalam, Kamon Jirasereeamongkul, K. Higuchi
{"title":"家用电磁炉最佳运行e类逆变器中Si IGBT与SiC MOSFET的比较研究","authors":"Satit Mangkalajarn, C. Ekkaravarodome, Surat Sukanna, A. Bilsalam, Kamon Jirasereeamongkul, K. Higuchi","doi":"10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study of switching characteristics of silicon (Si) insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) with the similar power rating is presented. The 1.2 kW/30 kHz domestic induction cooker prototype based on the optimal operation with zero-voltage and zero-derivative switching (ZVDS) Class-E inverter is built for evaluating the 1.2-kV/41-A Si IGBT and the 1.2-kV/ 40-A SiC MOSFET performance. The experimental results show that the Si IGBT has lower switching speed and much higher loss when compared with the SiC MOSFET. Moreover, the switching loss of the Si IGBT will increase significantly for high temperature operation, while the switching loss of the SiC MOSFET is almost constant for different of operation temperature. The experimental results show that the system efficiency can be increased from 96.5% to 98.7% when using the SiC MOSFET. Hence, making them suitable for lower losses and higher temperature applications.","PeriodicalId":404700,"journal":{"name":"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET in Optimal Operation Class-E Inverter for Domestic Induction Cooker\",\"authors\":\"Satit Mangkalajarn, C. Ekkaravarodome, Surat Sukanna, A. Bilsalam, Kamon Jirasereeamongkul, K. Higuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative study of switching characteristics of silicon (Si) insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) with the similar power rating is presented. The 1.2 kW/30 kHz domestic induction cooker prototype based on the optimal operation with zero-voltage and zero-derivative switching (ZVDS) Class-E inverter is built for evaluating the 1.2-kV/41-A Si IGBT and the 1.2-kV/ 40-A SiC MOSFET performance. The experimental results show that the Si IGBT has lower switching speed and much higher loss when compared with the SiC MOSFET. Moreover, the switching loss of the Si IGBT will increase significantly for high temperature operation, while the switching loss of the SiC MOSFET is almost constant for different of operation temperature. The experimental results show that the system efficiency can be increased from 96.5% to 98.7% when using the SiC MOSFET. Hence, making them suitable for lower losses and higher temperature applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

比较研究了额定功率相近的硅(Si)绝缘栅双极晶体管(IGBT)和碳化硅(SiC)金属氧化物半导体场效应晶体管(MOSFET)的开关特性。建立了基于零电压零导数开关(ZVDS) e类逆变器优化工作的1.2 kW/30 kHz家用电磁炉样机,对1.2 kv /41 a Si IGBT和1.2 kv / 40 a SiC MOSFET性能进行了评估。实验结果表明,与SiC MOSFET相比,Si IGBT具有更低的开关速度和更高的损耗。此外,Si IGBT的开关损耗在高温下会显著增加,而SiC MOSFET的开关损耗在不同的工作温度下几乎是恒定的。实验结果表明,使用SiC MOSFET可将系统效率从96.5%提高到98.7%。因此,使它们适用于低损耗和高温应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Si IGBT and SiC MOSFET in Optimal Operation Class-E Inverter for Domestic Induction Cooker
A comparative study of switching characteristics of silicon (Si) insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and silicon carbide (SiC) metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) with the similar power rating is presented. The 1.2 kW/30 kHz domestic induction cooker prototype based on the optimal operation with zero-voltage and zero-derivative switching (ZVDS) Class-E inverter is built for evaluating the 1.2-kV/41-A Si IGBT and the 1.2-kV/ 40-A SiC MOSFET performance. The experimental results show that the Si IGBT has lower switching speed and much higher loss when compared with the SiC MOSFET. Moreover, the switching loss of the Si IGBT will increase significantly for high temperature operation, while the switching loss of the SiC MOSFET is almost constant for different of operation temperature. The experimental results show that the system efficiency can be increased from 96.5% to 98.7% when using the SiC MOSFET. Hence, making them suitable for lower losses and higher temperature applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信