{"title":"智能软件Bug预测:一种经验方法","authors":"MD. Ariyan Jahangir, MD. Abtahi Tajwar, Waythin Marma, MD. Siyamul Islam","doi":"10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that, much research has been conducted to improve accuracy in software bug prediction through different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, not concentrated on the performance evaluation on the applicability of ML algorithms to detect software bugs. This inadequacy is focused on this paper. In this research, we conducted software bug prediction comparison on six different ML algorithms. Moreover, we adopted Code Based Metrics (CBM) to predict software defect through sequential neural network (DL) model and compared it with generic models. The performance of different models has been evaluated and compared based on PROMISE dataset provided by NASA. Results have shown that ML Techniques and DL Approaches have similar bug prediction capabilities where Decision Tree technique performing the worst and Support Vector Machine gave the best results. Also, thoughtful feature selection provides noticeable difference compared to no feature selection during model construction.","PeriodicalId":389360,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intelligent Software Bug Prediction: An Empirical Approach\",\"authors\":\"MD. Ariyan Jahangir, MD. Abtahi Tajwar, Waythin Marma, MD. Siyamul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the fact that, much research has been conducted to improve accuracy in software bug prediction through different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, not concentrated on the performance evaluation on the applicability of ML algorithms to detect software bugs. This inadequacy is focused on this paper. In this research, we conducted software bug prediction comparison on six different ML algorithms. Moreover, we adopted Code Based Metrics (CBM) to predict software defect through sequential neural network (DL) model and compared it with generic models. The performance of different models has been evaluated and compared based on PROMISE dataset provided by NASA. Results have shown that ML Techniques and DL Approaches have similar bug prediction capabilities where Decision Tree technique performing the worst and Support Vector Machine gave the best results. Also, thoughtful feature selection provides noticeable difference compared to no feature selection during model construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST57604.2023.10070026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管已经有很多研究通过不同的机器学习(ML)分类器来提高软件bug预测的准确性,但并没有集中在ML算法检测软件bug适用性的性能评估上。这是本文关注的不足之处。在这项研究中,我们对六种不同的机器学习算法进行了软件bug预测比较。在此基础上,采用基于代码度量(Code Based Metrics, CBM)的顺序神经网络(sequential neural network, DL)模型对软件缺陷进行预测,并与一般模型进行比较。基于NASA提供的PROMISE数据集,对不同模型的性能进行了评估和比较。结果表明,ML技术和DL方法具有相似的错误预测能力,其中决策树技术表现最差,支持向量机给出了最好的结果。此外,在模型构建过程中,深思熟虑的特征选择与没有特征选择相比提供了显著的差异。
Intelligent Software Bug Prediction: An Empirical Approach
Despite the fact that, much research has been conducted to improve accuracy in software bug prediction through different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, not concentrated on the performance evaluation on the applicability of ML algorithms to detect software bugs. This inadequacy is focused on this paper. In this research, we conducted software bug prediction comparison on six different ML algorithms. Moreover, we adopted Code Based Metrics (CBM) to predict software defect through sequential neural network (DL) model and compared it with generic models. The performance of different models has been evaluated and compared based on PROMISE dataset provided by NASA. Results have shown that ML Techniques and DL Approaches have similar bug prediction capabilities where Decision Tree technique performing the worst and Support Vector Machine gave the best results. Also, thoughtful feature selection provides noticeable difference compared to no feature selection during model construction.