关心的责任?英国法院对气候变化责任的展望

H. Macleod
{"title":"关心的责任?英国法院对气候变化责任的展望","authors":"H. Macleod","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3852700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘…the possibility of damages for those whose interests Urgenda represents, including current and future generations of Dutch nationals, is so great and concrete that given its duty of care, the state must make an adequate contribution, greater than its current contribution, to prevent hazardous climate change.’ Hague District Court, June 23rd, 2015.<br><br>In light of the above landmark ruling - which found the Dutch government owed a duty of care to its citizens over action to mitigate climate change - critically evaluate the chances and possible outcomes of bringing a similar action in the English courts, with particular reference to locus standi under tort, public and international law. <br>","PeriodicalId":157380,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Duty to Care? Prospects for Climate Change Liability in the English Courts\",\"authors\":\"H. Macleod\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3852700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"‘…the possibility of damages for those whose interests Urgenda represents, including current and future generations of Dutch nationals, is so great and concrete that given its duty of care, the state must make an adequate contribution, greater than its current contribution, to prevent hazardous climate change.’ Hague District Court, June 23rd, 2015.<br><br>In light of the above landmark ruling - which found the Dutch government owed a duty of care to its citizens over action to mitigate climate change - critically evaluate the chances and possible outcomes of bringing a similar action in the English courts, with particular reference to locus standi under tort, public and international law. <br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Anthropology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Anthropology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3852700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“……紧急议程所代表的利益,包括当前和未来的荷兰国民,受到损害的可能性是如此巨大和具体,鉴于其注意义务,国家必须做出足够的贡献,比目前的贡献更大,以防止危险的气候变化。”海牙地区法院,2015年6月23日。鉴于上述具有里程碑意义的裁决——该裁决认定荷兰政府在减缓气候变化的行动中对其公民负有注意义务——批判性地评估在英国法院提起类似诉讼的机会和可能的结果,特别是在侵权法、公法和国际法下的所在地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Duty to Care? Prospects for Climate Change Liability in the English Courts
‘…the possibility of damages for those whose interests Urgenda represents, including current and future generations of Dutch nationals, is so great and concrete that given its duty of care, the state must make an adequate contribution, greater than its current contribution, to prevent hazardous climate change.’ Hague District Court, June 23rd, 2015.

In light of the above landmark ruling - which found the Dutch government owed a duty of care to its citizens over action to mitigate climate change - critically evaluate the chances and possible outcomes of bringing a similar action in the English courts, with particular reference to locus standi under tort, public and international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信