法律应该禁止向绑架者支付赎金吗?绑架|有约束力的合同|生命的丧失

American Review of Political Economy Pub Date : 2008-06-01 DOI:10.38024/arpe.106

W. Block, Patrick C. Tinsley

{"title":"法律应该禁止向绑架者支付赎金吗?绑架|有约束力的合同|生命的丧失","authors":"W. Block, Patrick C. Tinsley","doi":"10.38024/arpe.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While most people might answer the question in the affirmative, such a law ends up punishing the victim instead of the kidnapper. Drawing from libertarian philosphy it is shown that such laws also fail to reduce kidnapping for profit and thus are not only offensive to the nature of justice but cannot achieve the aim for which they were originally enacted.","PeriodicalId":252052,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Political Economy","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should the Law Prohibit Paying Ransom to Kidnappers? Kidnapping|Binding Contracts|Aleinability of Life\",\"authors\":\"W. Block, Patrick C. Tinsley\",\"doi\":\"10.38024/arpe.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While most people might answer the question in the affirmative, such a law ends up punishing the victim instead of the kidnapper. Drawing from libertarian philosphy it is shown that such laws also fail to reduce kidnapping for profit and thus are not only offensive to the nature of justice but cannot achieve the aim for which they were originally enacted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Review of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Review of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38024/arpe.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然大多数人可能会肯定地回答这个问题，但这样的法律最终惩罚的是受害者而不是绑架者。从自由意志主义哲学的角度来看，这些法律也未能减少以利润为目的的绑架，因此不仅违背了正义的本质，而且无法实现最初制定这些法律的目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Should the Law Prohibit Paying Ransom to Kidnappers? Kidnapping|Binding Contracts|Aleinability of Life

While most people might answer the question in the affirmative, such a law ends up punishing the victim instead of the kidnapper. Drawing from libertarian philosphy it is shown that such laws also fail to reduce kidnapping for profit and thus are not only offensive to the nature of justice but cannot achieve the aim for which they were originally enacted.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Review of Political Economy

自引率

0.00%

发文量