员工持股计划:一份状态报告

P. Perun
{"title":"员工持股计划:一份状态报告","authors":"P. Perun","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.236837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past 25 years, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) have provided employers with a means to transfer substantial ownership interests to their employees. But as the popularity of company stock as an investment option increases among employees, employers have some new alternatives to consider. This report reviews the current status of ESOPs through an analysis of 1997 Form 5500 data collected by the Department of Labor. It also describes the competition - stock options, stock purchase plans and company stock funds in 401k plans. It concludes that ESOPs have lost much of their appeal as companies now have access to less complicated and more versatile means for aligning employee and corporate interests. The alternatives to ESOPS also provide employees with greater choice about how much company stock they will hold and when they will buy and sell it. The future of employee ownership does not appear to belong to ESOPs. But ESOPs still retain special financing and tax benefits particularly attractive to the small, privately held company. As long as Congress believes providing tax subsidies for ownership transfers to employees in such companies is important, ESOPs will most likely survive for this purpose alone rather than as a primary employee benefit.","PeriodicalId":180571,"journal":{"name":"Tax Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee Stock Ownership Plans: A Status Report\",\"authors\":\"P. Perun\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.236837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the past 25 years, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) have provided employers with a means to transfer substantial ownership interests to their employees. But as the popularity of company stock as an investment option increases among employees, employers have some new alternatives to consider. This report reviews the current status of ESOPs through an analysis of 1997 Form 5500 data collected by the Department of Labor. It also describes the competition - stock options, stock purchase plans and company stock funds in 401k plans. It concludes that ESOPs have lost much of their appeal as companies now have access to less complicated and more versatile means for aligning employee and corporate interests. The alternatives to ESOPS also provide employees with greater choice about how much company stock they will hold and when they will buy and sell it. The future of employee ownership does not appear to belong to ESOPs. But ESOPs still retain special financing and tax benefits particularly attractive to the small, privately held company. As long as Congress believes providing tax subsidies for ownership transfers to employees in such companies is important, ESOPs will most likely survive for this purpose alone rather than as a primary employee benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tax Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tax Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在过去的25年里,员工持股计划(ESOPs)为雇主提供了一种将大量所有权利益转移给员工的手段。但随着公司股票作为一种投资选择在员工中越来越受欢迎,雇主们有了一些新的选择可以考虑。本报告通过对劳工部收集的1997年5500表格数据的分析,回顾了员工持股计划的现状。介绍了401k计划中的股票期权、股票购买计划和公司股票基金的竞争情况。报告的结论是,员工持股计划已经失去了很大的吸引力,因为企业现在有了不那么复杂、更通用的方式来协调员工和企业的利益。员工持股计划的替代方案还为员工提供了更多的选择,包括他们将持有多少公司股票以及何时买卖股票。员工所有权的未来似乎不属于员工持股计划。但esop仍然保留着对小型私营公司特别有吸引力的特殊融资和税收优惠。只要国会认为向这些公司的员工转让所有权提供税收补贴很重要,持股计划就很可能仅为这一目的而存在,而不是作为一项主要的员工福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employee Stock Ownership Plans: A Status Report
For the past 25 years, employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) have provided employers with a means to transfer substantial ownership interests to their employees. But as the popularity of company stock as an investment option increases among employees, employers have some new alternatives to consider. This report reviews the current status of ESOPs through an analysis of 1997 Form 5500 data collected by the Department of Labor. It also describes the competition - stock options, stock purchase plans and company stock funds in 401k plans. It concludes that ESOPs have lost much of their appeal as companies now have access to less complicated and more versatile means for aligning employee and corporate interests. The alternatives to ESOPS also provide employees with greater choice about how much company stock they will hold and when they will buy and sell it. The future of employee ownership does not appear to belong to ESOPs. But ESOPs still retain special financing and tax benefits particularly attractive to the small, privately held company. As long as Congress believes providing tax subsidies for ownership transfers to employees in such companies is important, ESOPs will most likely survive for this purpose alone rather than as a primary employee benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信