公共图书馆作为艺术教育、创客运动和教育中的新自由主义议程的碰撞场所

Alexandra Lakind
{"title":"公共图书馆作为艺术教育、创客运动和教育中的新自由主义议程的碰撞场所","authors":"Alexandra Lakind","doi":"10.21977/D913133234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Lakind, Alexandra | Abstract: In recent years, the concept “making” has been claimed by “The Maker Movement.” While making offers great potential (and resources) for art integration in informal learning sites, maker discourse is often intertwined with a neoliberal mission. For example, movement leaders glorify Steve Jobs and hark on the myth that hobbies can be transformed into wealth-generating endeavors. As art-making activities in informal learning setting across the U.S. intersect with the maker movement, prominent learning theories that contradict this neoliberal philosophy may be repurposed or disremembered. Constructionist learning will require a continued commitment to a notion of learning by doing, “rather than acquiring theoretical precepts for subsequent application” (Ingold, 2013, p. 52). This article examines research from a multi-year empirical study of a Public Library system’s arts-based maker program. It provides a rich example of how discourse around making fits into learning in arts education, showcasing instances when neoliberal ideology collides with contradictory theories regarding how and why people learn and make. First, this paper will introduce the reader to the maker movement in education and review literature on making, learning, and neoliberalism. Secondly, I analyze the discourse of public librarians who implement the arts programming and suggest possible implications for how learning through the arts can be undermined by neoliberalism. And, finally, this article proposes a view of making that does align with arts education that embraces dispositional, constructionist, and post-modern/new materialist approaches to learning: Making as the reciprocal relationship between maker, material, tools, skill, and intention.","PeriodicalId":126779,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Libraries as Sites of Collision for Arts Education, the Maker Movement, and Neoliberal Agendas in Education\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Lakind\",\"doi\":\"10.21977/D913133234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Lakind, Alexandra | Abstract: In recent years, the concept “making” has been claimed by “The Maker Movement.” While making offers great potential (and resources) for art integration in informal learning sites, maker discourse is often intertwined with a neoliberal mission. For example, movement leaders glorify Steve Jobs and hark on the myth that hobbies can be transformed into wealth-generating endeavors. As art-making activities in informal learning setting across the U.S. intersect with the maker movement, prominent learning theories that contradict this neoliberal philosophy may be repurposed or disremembered. Constructionist learning will require a continued commitment to a notion of learning by doing, “rather than acquiring theoretical precepts for subsequent application” (Ingold, 2013, p. 52). This article examines research from a multi-year empirical study of a Public Library system’s arts-based maker program. It provides a rich example of how discourse around making fits into learning in arts education, showcasing instances when neoliberal ideology collides with contradictory theories regarding how and why people learn and make. First, this paper will introduce the reader to the maker movement in education and review literature on making, learning, and neoliberalism. Secondly, I analyze the discourse of public librarians who implement the arts programming and suggest possible implications for how learning through the arts can be undermined by neoliberalism. And, finally, this article proposes a view of making that does align with arts education that embraces dispositional, constructionist, and post-modern/new materialist approaches to learning: Making as the reciprocal relationship between maker, material, tools, skill, and intention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21977/D913133234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21977/D913133234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要:近年来,“创客运动”(the Maker Movement)提出了“制造”的概念。虽然制作为非正式学习场所的艺术整合提供了巨大的潜力(和资源),但创客话语往往与新自由主义使命交织在一起。例如,运动领袖赞美史蒂夫•乔布斯(Steve Jobs),并宣扬爱好可以转化为创造财富的努力这一神话。随着美国非正式学习环境中的艺术创作活动与创客运动相交,与这种新自由主义哲学相矛盾的杰出学习理论可能会被重新利用或被遗忘。建构主义学习将需要持续致力于通过实践来学习的概念,“而不是获取后续应用的理论戒律”(Ingold, 2013, p. 52)。本文对公共图书馆系统的艺术创客计划进行了多年的实证研究。它提供了一个丰富的例子,说明围绕制作的话语如何适应艺术教育中的学习,展示了新自由主义意识形态与关于人们如何以及为什么学习和制作的矛盾理论发生冲突的实例。首先,本文将向读者介绍教育中的创客运动,并回顾有关制作、学习和新自由主义的文献。其次,我分析了公共图书馆员实施艺术规划的话语,并提出了通过艺术学习如何被新自由主义破坏的可能含义。最后,本文提出了一种与艺术教育相一致的制作观,它包含了性格、建构主义和后现代/新唯物主义的学习方法:制作是制造者、材料、工具、技能和意图之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Libraries as Sites of Collision for Arts Education, the Maker Movement, and Neoliberal Agendas in Education
Author(s): Lakind, Alexandra | Abstract: In recent years, the concept “making” has been claimed by “The Maker Movement.” While making offers great potential (and resources) for art integration in informal learning sites, maker discourse is often intertwined with a neoliberal mission. For example, movement leaders glorify Steve Jobs and hark on the myth that hobbies can be transformed into wealth-generating endeavors. As art-making activities in informal learning setting across the U.S. intersect with the maker movement, prominent learning theories that contradict this neoliberal philosophy may be repurposed or disremembered. Constructionist learning will require a continued commitment to a notion of learning by doing, “rather than acquiring theoretical precepts for subsequent application” (Ingold, 2013, p. 52). This article examines research from a multi-year empirical study of a Public Library system’s arts-based maker program. It provides a rich example of how discourse around making fits into learning in arts education, showcasing instances when neoliberal ideology collides with contradictory theories regarding how and why people learn and make. First, this paper will introduce the reader to the maker movement in education and review literature on making, learning, and neoliberalism. Secondly, I analyze the discourse of public librarians who implement the arts programming and suggest possible implications for how learning through the arts can be undermined by neoliberalism. And, finally, this article proposes a view of making that does align with arts education that embraces dispositional, constructionist, and post-modern/new materialist approaches to learning: Making as the reciprocal relationship between maker, material, tools, skill, and intention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信